June 28, 2010 - Minutes
 |
Regular Council Meeting
Monday, June 28, 2010
|
Time: |
7:00 p.m. |
|
Place: |
Council Chambers Richmond City Hall |
|
Present: |
Mayor Malcolm D. Brodie Councillor Linda Barnes Councillor Derek Dang Councillor Evelina Halsey-Brandt Councillor Greg Halsey-Brandt Councillor Sue Halsey-Brandt Councillor Ken Johnston Councillor Bill McNulty Councillor Harold Steves Director, City Clerk’s Office – David Weber |
|
Call to Order: |
Mayor Brodie called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. |
|
RES NO. |
ITEM |
|
|
|
|
MINUTES
|
|
R10/11-1 |
1. |
It was moved and seconded |
||
|
|
|
That: |
||
|
|
|
(1) |
the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held on Monday, June 14, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting for Public Hearings held on Monday, June 21, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
each be adopted as circulated. |
||
|
|
|
CARRIED |
||
|
|
|
AGENDA ADDITIONS & DELETIONS
|
|
R10/11-2 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That “UBCM Resolution on Victim Services” be added to the Council Agenda as Item No. 30A. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
|
PRESENTATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In reply to queries from Council, Mr. Anderson advised that: (i) Richmond’s water is regularly tested and monitored and it is difficult to determine how long water has been bottled; and (ii) turbidity is typically caused by the infiltration of soil materials into water reservoirs during heavy rainfall. |
|
|
|
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
|
|
R10/11-3 |
2. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on agenda items (7:23 p.m.). |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
3. |
Delegations from the floor on Agenda items. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
John Falcus, 3111 Springside Place, owner of Seabreeze Guest House, provided background information and listed the tasks he has undertaken in an effort to comply to all City bylaws. Mr. Falcus described his bed and breakfast (B&B) as a ‘home away from home’ for his guests and noted that typically, his clients are middle-aged, retired individuals, not party-goers. |
|
|
|
Mr. Falcus hoped that his application, the first of its kind, would help create standards among other B&Bs in Richmond and a sense of community. He spoke of economic benefits B&Bs can provide to Richmond and that they are great alternatives to big hotels. |
|
|
|
Mr. Falcus concluded by requesting that his application be sent to a Public Hearing and that Council consider his application carefully as he was of the opinion that his application was not merely about his B&B operation, but also about other future B&B applications. |
|
|
|
In reply to queries from Council, Mr. Falcus advised that he is open to amending his application to reflect a maximum of two rooms / four guests and that he was willing to work with the City and his neighbours to ensure his B&B is run professionally. |
|
|
|
In response to queries from Council, staff advised that: (i) the current zoning bylaw permits two boarders in any given single-family dwelling; (ii) it is difficult to fine B&Bs for too many guests as is it difficult to differentiate between paying guests, and family and friends. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Gloria Gausboel, 3131 Springside Place, spoke in opposition to the application and stated that she would not have purchased the adjoining property had she known of Mr. Falcus’ B&B. Ms. Gausboel was of the opinion that Mr. Falcus’ B&B has been running above capacity with at least six guests staying there on a regular basis at any given time. She commented on a petition submitted to the Community Bylaws division in 2006. Ms. Gausboel spoke of the inconveniences the B&B has brought into the cul-de-sac, noting traffic, parking, and noise as primary concerns. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Tracy Lakeman, representing Tourism Richmond, asked that Council carefully consider Mr. Falcus’ application and wished to see it go to Public Hearing. |
|
|
|
Ms. Lakeman was of the opinion that B&Bs are integral to tourism and worth a lot to the local economy. She reiterated that she wished that the proposed application go forward to Public Hearing as she felt it would be a good forum for both sides to be heard and this process would help ensure Richmond B&Bs are professional and an enterprise Richmond could be proud of. |
|
|
|
In reply to queries from Council, Ms. Lakeman commented that she hoped the current application’s process would not deter other B&Bs from coming forward and noted that many B&Bs adhere to codes of conduct under the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts. |
|
|
|
In response to a query from Council, Brian J. Jackson, Director of Development, advised that the new zoning bylaw created a new zone for B&Bs and noted that the new zone does not include location criteria for B&Bs, however there is a parking provision. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Lesley Kemp, 10020 Nishi Court, owner/operator of a local B&B, provided background information and noted that when she started her B&B business, there was no formal process for B&Bs in Richmond. She referred to correspondence received from Tourism Richmond advising that her B&B could no longer advertise on Tourism Richmond’s website as her B&B offered more beds than are allowed under Richmond’s new zoning bylaw. |
|
|
|
Ms. Kemp referenced a letter she had sent to the City that included research on licence fees, safety and parking requirements and so forth from other municipalities in the lower mainland that regulate B&Bs. She concluded by stating that many B&Bs are seasonal, and cannot afford to go through the rezoning process. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Julie Bell, 12411 Trites Road, owner/operator of Seaside Marketing, noted that many of Steveston’s businesses are seasonal and that B&Bs offer an opportunity to positively showcase the community to visitors. She stated that the cul-de-sac where the Seabreeze Guest House is located is large, and the home is pristine. She was of the opinion that Mr. Falcus’ B&B is beneficial to the community, in particular Steveston Village. Also, Ms. Bell believed that Mr. Falcus’ application would set standards for other local B&Bs. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Brian Cooper, Stone Hedge B&B, provided background information and noted that when he established the Stone Hedge B&B, there were no formal rules, policies, or licences for B&Bs. Mr. Cooper spoke of large illegal boarding houses and was of the opinion that the criticism of B&Bs originated with the criticism surrounding the illegal boarding houses. He concluded by stating that other lower mainland municipalities have successfully addressed the issues surrounding B&Bs and Richmond should follow. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Daren Foster, Vice President of International Pacific, advised that he resides on Vancouver Island, but works regularly in Richmond and as such, has stayed at the Seabreeze Guest House every week for the past five years. Mr. Foster was of the opinion that the guests are mostly professional, middle-aged people. He sympathized with the residents within the cul-de-sac and spoke of Mr. Falcus’ efforts to appease his immediate neighbours. Mr. Foster remarked that he would like to continue to stay at the Seabreeze Guest House as he enjoys its access to the dyke, the proximity to Steveston Village, and the quiet atmosphere. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Dianne Milsom, 10591 Springhill Crescent, spoke in favour of the application and stated that over the last five years, she has watched Mr. Falcus’ property transform from a single-family home into an attractive B&B. Ms. Milsom questioned some remarks made by other neighbours in opposition to the proposed rezoning and stated that the cul-de-sac is very large, and it is not always full of cars. A copy of Ms. Milsom’s submission is attached to and forming part of these Minutes as Schedule 1. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Dianne van Houten, 5880 Dover Crescent, was in favour of the application and stated that she is a friend of the applicant. She spoke of Mr. Falcus’ character and noted that his B&B offers reasonable accommodations and encourages tourism. Ms. van Houten noted several events that take place in Steveston Village and questioned where visitors would stay as there is only one hotel in Steveston. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Lance Carey, 10595 Springhill Crescent, spoke in favour of the application and stated that Mr. Falcus is an excellent, considerate neighbour. Mr. Carey read from his submission, attached to and forming part of these Minutes as Schedule 2. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Sherry Lazaruk, 3180 Springside Place, spoke in opposition to the application. As a long-time cul-de-sac resident, she spoke of her children safely playing in the cul-de-sac and enjoying the tranquillity of the cul-de-sac. Ms. Lazaruk noted that since the establishment of the B&B, traffic in the cul-de-sac has increased immensely by not only guests, but by taxis too. Ms. Lazaruk was of the opinion that neighbours not living within the cul-de-sac may not be affected by the traffic as they do not experience it first hand. She believed that Mr. Falcus is regularly over the allowable B&B capacity. |
|
|
|
Ms. Lazaruk concluded by remarking that she is not against B&Bs, but believed that there is a place for them, and a quiet cul-de-sac is not one of them. Also, she felt the B&B devalued her property. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
John Gausboel, 3131 Springside Place, spoke in opposition of the application. He stated that he has complained about the B&B to Community Bylaws and was disappointed with the lack of response to a petition signed by the neighbours. He provided background information and noted that he would never have bought the adjacent lot and built his home there had he known the property next door was a B&B. Mr. Gausboel was of the opinion that Mr. Falcus’ business is not a small B&B, but rather a large operation and that he is inconsiderate of the cul-de-sac neighbours. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Mathieu Pilon, 3140 Springside Place, spoke in opposition to the application. He commented on the benefits of B&Bs for local tourism and economy, but stated that local residents’ needs should not be forgotten as they deserve a certain quality of life. He wished that his neighbourhood remain strictly residential. Mr. Pilon was of the opinion that a B&B would be better suited at a nearby commercial zoned lot. Also, he spoke of the lack of trust between cul-de-sac neighbours and Mr. Falcus and believed that the relationship between the two parties is broken beyond repair. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Robert Falcus, 5600 Andrews Road, spoke in favour of his brother’s application and believed that the cul-de-sac neighbours were attacking his brother’s character. Mr. Falcus spoke of a family gathering at his brother’s home and assured Council that it was a respectful event. Also, he provided background information in relation to several comments made by opposing neighbours and questioned whether all the bridges along the west dyke would have to be Engineer certified. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Brian Coleman, 10740 Rosecroft Crescent, was in favour of the proposed application and advised that he was Mr. Falcus’ friend, and described Mr. Falcus as friendly, calm and thoughtful. He believed that Richmond needed more B&Bs like Mr. Falcus’. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Judy van Houten, Skagit Drive resident, was in favour of the application. Ms. van Houten stated that she has referred friends to Mr. Falcus’ B&B and has heard wonderful things of their stay, particularly about its location and the neighbourhood’s serenity. She concluded by stating that Mr. Falcus is respectful, polite and operates a wonderful B&B that she is proud to refer people to. A copy of Ms. van Houten’s submission is attached to and forming part of these Minutes as Schedule 3. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Shane Dagan, Steveston Seafood House, supported the application. He noted that he is familiar with the B&Bs clientele as they often dine at his restaurant, and believed they were not problematic. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Colleen Boyle, 3088 Francis Road, was in favour of the application and stated that Mr. Falcus is considerate of others. Ms. Boyle advised that she lives in a cul-de-sac and her cul-de-sac also sees lots of traffic, teenagers late at night and so forth. She believed that the B&B’s operations were unrelated to the problems in the cul-de-sac. A copy of Ms. Boyle’s submission is attached to and forming part of these Minutes as Schedule 4. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Bryan Ralphs, 4280 Moncton Street, spoke in favour of the application and noted that he works in tourism and is family friends with the Falcus family. Mr. Ralphs stated that Mr. Falcus takes pride in his home and commented that he once had friendly relations with his cul-de-sac neighbours. Mr. Ralphs questioned how the neighbourly friendship ended and noted that Mr. Falcus simply wants to keep his home and B&B operation well maintained. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Tamara Ahara, 3071 Springfield Drive, was in favour of the application and advised that she has heard great things of Mr. Falcus’ B&B. She stated that the B&B’s guests are mostly middle-aged and the B&B does not have parties. She supported Mr. Falcus and wished to see the application go forward to a Public Hearing. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Sandy Falcus, Richmond resident, supported her brother-in-law’s proposed application and stated that Mr. Falcus has declined business opportunities to host events in light of the situation with his cul-de-sac neighbours. She spoke of the B&B’s aesthetics and asked that the proposed application be considered based on its merits and not on what has been said by irate neighbours. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
John Caruso, 3180 Springford Avenue, spoke in favour of the application and was of the opinion that the concerns raised by the cul-de-sac residents are not related to Mr. Falcus’ B&B operation. He commented on neighbours’ complaints and questioned whether the City wished to see B&Bs in residential neighbourhoods or not. |
|
|
|
Item No. 11 – Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) To Single Detached (RS3/E) |
|
|
|
Chelsea Roisum, 11020 4th Avenue, was in favour of the application and spoke of Mr. Falcus’ character stating that he is a friendly person. Ms. Roisum remarked that the B&B is wonderful and noted that she is now hesitant to visit Mr. Falcus as she does want to upset his neighbours if she parks on the street. |
|
R10/11-4 |
4. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Committee rise and report (9:26 p.m.). |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
R10/11-5 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Item 11 “Application by John Falcus for Rezoning at 3111 Springside Place from Single Detached (RS1/E) to Single Detached (RS3/E)” be considered next. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
11. |
APPLICATION BY JOHN FALCUS FOR REZONING AT 3111 SPRINGSIDE PLACE FROM SINGLE DETACHED (RS1/E) TO SINGLE DETACHED (RS3/E) |
|
|
R10/11-6 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8621, for the rezoning of 3111 Springside Place from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” to “Single Detached (RS3/E)”, be denied. |
|
|
|
|
The question on Resolution R10/11-6 was not called as discussion ensued and Council members commented on the most appropriate step for the proposed application. It was noted that Mr. Falcus is now willing to amend his application and address the cul-de-sac’s concerns. |
|
|
|
|
As a result of the discussion, the following referral was introduced: |
|
|
R10/11-7 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8621, for the rezoning of 3111 Springside Place from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” to “Single Detached (RS3/E)”, be referred back to staff to investigate the following: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
locational criteria; |
|
|
|
(b) |
performance standards; |
|
|
|
(c) |
industry consultation; |
|
|
|
(d) |
street parking; |
|
|
|
(e) |
expansion impacts; |
|
|
|
(f) |
safety; |
|
|
|
(g) |
licence fees; and |
|
|
|
(h) |
the difference between B&Bs and boarding houses. |
|
|
|
The question on referral motion R10/11-7 was not called as staff were asked to assist with communication between the applicant and the neighbours if it was desired by the parties. |
|
|
|
|
The question on referral motion R10/11-7 was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllr. G. Halsey-Brandt opposed. |
|
|
|
|
CONSENT AGENDA
|
|
R10/11-8 |
5. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Items 6 through 25 be adopted by general consent, with the removal of Item No. 11. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
6. |
COMMITTEE MINUTES |
|
|
|
|
That the minutes of: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the Community Safety Committee meeting held on Tuesday, June 15, 2010; |
|
|
|
(2) |
the General Purposes Committee meeting held on Monday, June 21, 2010; |
|
|
|
(3) |
the Planning Committee meeting held on Tuesday, June 22, 2010; and |
|
|
|
(4) |
the Public Works & Transportation Committee meeting held on Wednesday, June 23, 2010; |
|
|
|
be received for information. |
|
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
7. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8080-05, UP 09-476230) (REDMS No. 2882707, 2880877) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
That Walden Disposal and Tractor Service, as contractor for the City, be authorized to remove and dispose of all discarded materials on or after July 15, 2010 at 23060 Westminster Hwy, Richmond, in accordance with the “Order to Comply” dated April 22, 2010 issued under the Unsightly Premises Bylaw No. 7162 and section 17(1) of the Community Charter; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
That the final cost of this removal and disposal, estimated at $4299.75 (including fees and taxes), be invoiced to the registered owner of the property located at 23060 Westminster Hwy. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
8. |
Vial of Life Program – Richmond Fire-Rescue Support (File Ref. No.: 07-3040-17) (REDMS No. 2907371) |
|
|
|
|
That: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
the in-kind support of Richmond Fire-Rescue staff time to the Vial of Life Program be approved, and staff report back on the success of the program by June 2011 and the time requirement of the Program; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
a one-time $3,000 contribution to the Vial of Life Program be supported and the amount be funded from the Council Contingency Fund account. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
9. |
SOIL PROCESSING NON-FARM USE APPLICATION KUTNY'S LANDSCAPING LTD., 9811 NO. 6 ROAD (File Ref. No.: 08-4105-20, NF 10-531483) (REDMS No. 2860186) |
|
|
|
That the soil processing non-farm use application submitted by Kutny’s Landscaping Ltd. for their topsoil business at 9811 No 6 Road be endorsed. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
10. |
Corporate Sustainability Framework – Climate Change Strategic Program (File Ref. No.: 01-0340-03-01) (REDMS No. 2918570) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
That the Corporate Climate Change Strategic Program, as presented in Attachment 1 of the report dated June 1, 2010 entitled “Corporate Sustainability Framework – Climate Change Strategic Program” be endorsed; |
|
|
|
(2) |
That funds from the Climate Action Revenue Incentive Program be placed in a Carbon Neutral Provisional Fund and used to support greater Corporate GHG reduction actions; |
|
|
|
(3) |
That the Mayor send a letter to the Premier of BC with copies to the Minister of Environment and the Minister of State for Climate Action and local MLAs requesting that the Province reinstate funding for the Climate Change Showdown initiative; and |
|
|
|
(4) |
That a copy of this report be forwarded to the Richmond Board of Trustees and John Yap, MLA and Minister of State for Climate Action. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
11. |
APPLICATION BY JOHN FALCUS FOR REZONING AT 3111 SPRINGSIDE PLACE FROM SINGLE DETACHED (RS1/E) TO SINGLE DETACHED (RS3/E)(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8621, RZ 10-511408) (REDMS No. 2902086, 2908289) |
|
|
|
See Page 10 for action taken on this matter. |
|
|
12. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8634/8635, RZ 09-503308) (REDMS No. 2912879, 2915328, 2914386, 2303774) |
|
|
|
|
That: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Bylaw No. 8634 to create the Industrial Storage (IS1) sub-zone, be introduced and given first reading; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
Bylaw No. 8635 for the rezoning of 16780 River Road from “Agriculture (AG1)” to “Industrial Storage (IS1)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
13. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8622, RZ 10-515821) (REDMS No. 2908306, 2908757) |
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8622, for the rezoning of 8120 Heather Street from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” to “Single Detached (RS2/A)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
14. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8623, RZ 10-522209) (REDMS No. 2909012, 2909980) |
|
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8623, for the rezoning of 3640/3660 Blundell Road from “Two-Unit Dwellings (RD1)” to “Single Detached (RS2/B)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
15. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8624/8625, RZ 10-510756) (REDMS No. 2901156, 2908955, 2908706) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
That Bylaw No. 8624, to amend Section 8.3.4.2 of Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500 to clarify the permitted density under the Coach House (RCH) zone, be introduced and given first reading; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
That Bylaw No. 8625, for the rezoning of 9451 No. 1 Road from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” to “Coach House (RCH)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
16. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8627, RZ 08-437228) (REDMS No. 2910682, 1077644, 2910679) |
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8627, for the rezoning of 12120 Woodhead Road from “Single Detached (RS1/F)” to “Single Detached (RS2/B)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
17. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8628, RZ 07390155) (REDMS No. 2909921, 2911138) |
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8628, for the rezoning of 9840 Alberta Road from “Single Detached (RS1/F)” to “Town Housing (ZT60)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
18. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8630/8631, RZ 10-518827) (REDMS No. 2907657, 2912046, 2912015) |
||
|
|
|
That: |
||
|
|
|
(1) |
Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 7100 Amendment Bylaw No. 8630 proposing to amend the Land Use Map of Schedule 2.10C (McLennan North Sub-Area Plan) by redesignating the section of Birch Street between Hemlock Drive and Alberta Road from Principal Road to Trail, be introduced and given First Reading; |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Bylaw No. 8630, having been considered in conjunction with: |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the City’s Financial Plan and Capital Program; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
the Greater Vancouver Regional District Solid Waste and Liquid Waste Management Plans; |
|
|
|
|
is hereby deemed to be consistent with said program and plans, in accordance with Section 882(3)(a) of the Local Government Act; |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Bylaw No. 8630 having been considered in accordance with the City Policy on Consultation During OCP Development, is hereby deemed not to require further consultation; and |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Bylaw No. 8631 for the rezoning of 9651 Alberta Road from “Single Detached, (RS1/F)” to “High Density Townhouses (RTH1)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
||
|
|
19. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8610, RZ 09-453123) (REDMS No. 2887749, 2807960, 2912014) |
|
|
|
That Bylaw 8610 for the rezoning of 9340, 9360 and 9400 Odlin Road from “Single Detached (RS1/F)” to “Low Rise Apartment (ZLR24) – Alexandra Neighbourhood (West Cambie), be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
20. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8626, RZ 09-453123) (REDMS No.2909730, 2909825, 2910370) |
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8626 be introduced and given first, second and third readings to permit the City, once Bylaw No. 8626 has been adopted, to enter into a Housing Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto, in accordance with the requirements of s. 905 of the Local Government Act, to secure the Affordable Housing Units required by Rezoning Application No. 09-453123 and the associated Bylaw No. 8610. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
21. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8620, RZ 07-380222) (REDMS No. 2907767, 2907923, 2907251) |
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8620 be introduced and given first, second and third readings to permit the City once Bylaw No. 8620 has been adopted, to enter into a Housing Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto, in accordance with the requirements of s. 905 of the Local Government Act to secure the Affordable Housing Units required by Rezoning Application No. 07-380222 and the associated Bylaw No. 8604 and Bylaw No. 8605. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
22. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8557, Xr.: 07-3070-03-01) (REDMS No. 2907876, 2884543, 2907876, 2905467, 2873262, 2838968, 2867990) |
|
|
|
|
That the Community Amenity Benefits negotiated through the TransLink site rezoning be used, as proposed in the Director of Development’s report to Planning Committee dated December 10, 2009, for the establishment of a City-owned child care facility on the Community Amenity Lands given that, prior to opening the facility, staff have addressed safety concerns raised by the Hamilton Community Association in the following ways: |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
vehicular access to the Community Amenity Lands be situated at the north-east corner of the site on Westminster Highway; |
|
|
|
(2) |
an asphalt walkway with extruded curb be provided on the north side of Westminster Highway, from the western edge of the Community Amenity Lands to Smith Crescent, at the estimated cost of $45,000; |
|
|
|
(3) |
a special crosswalk with advanced warning signage be installed on Westminster Highway at Smith Crescent, at the estimated cost of $40,000; |
|
|
|
(4) |
an extruded curb be installed between the existing eastbound travel lane and shoulder on the east side of Westminster Highway, from Smith Crescent to Gilley Road, to create a delineated walkway and cycling path at the estimated cost of $70,000; |
|
|
|
(5) |
a new bus stop for the westbound bus be located in close proximity to the Community Amenity Lands on Westminster Highway; and |
|
|
|
(6) |
staff comment on the issues surrounding the pedestrian improvements on the north side of Westminster Highway. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
23. |
TRANSLINK SMART CARD AND FAREGATE PROJECT - IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE (File Ref. No. 01-0154-04) (REDMS No. 2898166) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
That staff continue to work with TransLink to facilitate the implementation of a smart card fare collection system including electronic faregates at all Canada Line rapid transit stations; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
That a letter be sent to the Minister of Transportation, TransLink, and local MLAs stressing the importance and Richmond City Council’s support for smart cards and faregates. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
24. |
FUNDING AND CONDITION OF ROADS (File Ref. No.: 10-6060-05-01) (REDMS No. 2894287) |
|
|
|
That $574,000 be allocated to rehabilitation of No. 4 Road from Westminster Highway to Granville Avenue from the Asphalt Paving Provision Account. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
25. |
2009 ANNUAL WATER QUALITY REPORT (File Ref. No.: 10-6650-08-01) (REDMS No. 2875876, 2816251) |
|
|
|
That the 2009 Annual Water Quality Report dated June 4, 2010 be approved. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
|
GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE –
|
|
|
26. |
YVR’S REQUEST FOR UBCM RESOLUTIONS SUPPORT (File Ref. No.: 01-0153-01) |
|
|
R10/11-9 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
|
That the following resolution as presented in the letter dated June 18, 2010 from YVR’s Senior Vice President Marking and Business Development, entitled “Elimination of Provincial Fuel Tax on International Passenger Flights” be supported and submitted to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities: |
|
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS local airports and communities recognize and appreciate that the Province eliminated fuel taxes on international cargo operations, and that the carbon tax is not applicable to international flights; |
|
|
|
|
AND WHEREAS other provincial jurisdictions have eliminated fuel tax on international flights, placing them in a more competitive position to significantly enhance new opportunities and gain new business; |
|
|
|
|
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Government of British Columbia eliminate the fuel tax on all international passenger flights, which would cost the government approximately $20 million annually in forfeited revenue but the growth in international travel would quickly offset this amount and generate a net increase in government’s overall revenues, as well as supporting economic development in airport communities and improving BC’s international connectivity, building a base for future growth. |
|
|
|
CARRIED Opposed: Cllrs. S. Halsey-Brandt Steves |
|
|
|
27. |
YVR’S REQUEST FOR UBCM RESOLUTIONS SUPPORT (File Ref. No.: 01-0153-01) |
|
|
R10/11-10 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
|
That the following resolution as presented in the letter dated June 18, 2010 from YVR’s Senior Vice President Marking and Business Development, entitled “Provincial Support for Airport Marketing Programs” be supported and submitted to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities: |
|
|
|
|
|
WHEREAS local communities across British Columbia recognize their airports are a significant economic generator but there is no systematic marketing effort for our airports; |
|
|
|
|
AND WHEREAS recent changes in international agreements will facilitate travel from Asia and the recovering world economy will stimulate new route planning by airlines, and the World Route Development Forum held in Vancouver in September 2010 – in North America for the first time – will give the province additional profile among airlines and travel planners; |
|
|
|
|
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Province of British Columbia work with BC airports to create an air service marketing program that would generate awareness of what our province has to offer, leverage financial resources and initiate a greater sharing of information among partners to help improve BC’s marketing, and increase international and transborder flights to BC. Such a program, involving the Province, BC Airports and regional economic development agencies as well as Destination Marketing Organizations and tourism agencies, would include promoting British Columbia as Canada’s gateway between North America and Asia for air travelers and air cargo, as well as identifying specific target markets in the US and Europe and appropriate promotional materials. |
|
|
|
CARRIED Opposed: Cllr. Steves |
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS & FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
|
|
|
28. |
2009 Statement of Financial Information (File Ref. No.: 03-1200-03/2010) (REDMS No. 2897083) |
|
R10/11-11 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the attached statements and schedules of Financial Information reported for the year ended December 31, 2009 be approved. |
|
|
|
The question on Resolution R10/11-11 was not called as Andrew Nazareth, General Manager, Business & Financial Services replied to queries from Council. |
|
|
|
The question on Resolution R10/11-11 was then called and it was CARRIED. |
|
R10/11-12 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the Monday, June 28, 2010 Council meeting continue past 11:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
29. |
Council Remuneration and Expenses for 2009 (File Ref. No.: 01-0105-08-01) (REDMS No. 2888732) |
|
R10/11-13 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the Council Remuneration and Expenses report for the year ended December 31, 2009 be received for information. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
30. |
2009 Annual Development Cost Charges Report (File Ref. No.: 03-0900-01) (REDMS No. 2915711, 2908966) |
|
R10/11-14 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the attached 2009 Annual Development Cost Charges report for the year-ended December 31, 2009 be approved. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
30A. |
UBCM RESOLUTION ON VICTIM SERVICES (File Ref. No.: 03-1000-13-011) |
|
|
R10/11-15 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
WHEREAS the cost to municipalities of providing police based victim services continues to escalate due to the increased demand for the service; |
|
|
|
AND WHEREAS the Ministry of the Solicitor General initially funded 50% of the cost of the program; |
|
|
|
AND WHEREAS the Ministry of the Solicitor General has maintained its funding expenditure at a fixed amount for many years; |
|
|
|
AND WHEREAS providing assistance to victims of crime is a social service, which is primarily the financial responsibility of the Province: |
|
|
|
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities continue to strongly endorse the Victim Services Program and that the Province be requested to fund the program on a 50/50 cost shared basis as it was originally established. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
|
PUBLIC DELEGATIONS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
|
|
R10/11-16 |
31. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on non-agenda items (11:10 p.m.). |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
|
|
Arzeena Hamir, Richmond Food Security Society, joined by April Reeves, GE Free BC member, distributed a revised resolution (Schedule 5). Ms. Reeves provided background information and noted that her group is seeking a Council resolution for Richmond to be free of genetically engineered plants, trees and crops. |
|
|
|
|
In response to queries from Council, Ms. Reeves advised that most genetically engineered crops are commodities such as corn, soy, canola and cotton. However, she noted that it is anticipated that vegetables will soon be genetically engineered and the proposed resolution would protect Richmond’s farmers. |
|
|
|
|
Ms. Hamir spoke of other genetically engineered foods and provided information on food patents in the United States. |
|
|
|
|
As a result of the presentation, the following referral motion was introduced: |
|
|
R10/11-17 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
|
That the proposed resolution from Genetically Engineered Free BC be referred to staff and to the Richmond Agricultural Advisory Committee and other appropriate parties for comment, and to report back through Committee. |
|
|
|
The question on referral motion R10/11-17 was not called as staff were directed to also advise Council on the City’s regulatory authority in relation to this issue. |
|
|
|
|
The question on referral motion R10/11-17 was then called and it was CARRIED. |
|
|
R10/11-18 |
32. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Committee rise and report (11:30 p.m.). |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
|
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS AND EVENTS
|
|
|
|
It was announced that Councillor Bill McNulty has been appointed as Richmond’s representative to E-Comm until June 23, 2011. |
|
|
|
BYLAWS FOR ADOPTION
|
|
R10/11-19 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the following bylaws be adopted: |
|
|
Public Parks and School Grounds Regulation Bylaw No. 7310, Amendment Bylaw No. 8612 |
|
|
|
Municipal Ticket Information Bylaw No. 7321, Amendment Bylaw No. 8613 |
|
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 8577 (9171 and 9191 No. 3 Road, RZ 09-494705) |
|
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 8585 (9395 Dixon Avenue, RZ 09-490643) |
|
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
|
ADJOURNMENT
|
|
R10/11-20 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (11:31 p.m.). |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Monday, June 28, 2010. |
|
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
|
Mayor (Malcolm D. Brodie) |
Corporate Officer (David Weber) |