February 12, 2024 - Minutes

Place:

Council Chambers
Richmond City Hall

Present:

Mayor Malcolm D. Brodie
Councillor Chak Au
Councillor Carol Day
Councillor Laura Gillanders
Councillor Kash Heed
Councillor Andy Hobbs
Councillor Alexa Loo
Councillor Bill McNulty
Councillor Michael Wolfe

Corporate Officer – Claudia Jesson

Call to Order:

Mayor Brodie called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

RES NO.

ITEM

MINUTES

R24/3-1

1.

It was moved and seconded

That:

(1)

the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on January 29, 2024; and

(2)

the Metro Vancouver ‘Board in Brief’ dated January 26, 2024, be received for information.

CARRIED

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

R24/3-2

2.

It was moved and seconded

That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on agenda items (7:01 p.m.).

CARRIED

3.

Delegations from the floor on Agenda items.

Item No. 18 – Supervised Consumption Site

The following speakers spoke in opposition:

·          

Lilian Tsang, 7380 Elmbridge Way;

·          

Stephanie Yu, 8600 Ackroyd Rd;

·          

Kenneth Lo, Richmond resident;

·          

Mei Yee Ng, Richmond resident;

·          

Christine Zhou, Richmond resident;

·          

Rachel Miu, Richmond resident;

·          

Lilian Chow, Richmond resident;

·          

Clifton Jang, 5900 Alderbridge Way;

·          

Caden Po, Richmond resident;

·          

Mimi Vong, Richmond resident;

·          

Sheldon Starrett, Richmond resident;

·          

Ng Siu, Richmond resident;

·          

Mimi Cheng, Richmond resident;

·          

Dickens Cheung, Richmond resident;

·          

Tommy Wan, Richmond resident;

·          

Philip Law, Richmond resident;

·          

Cecilia Fung, Richmond resident;

·          

Lei Zheng, Richmond resident;

·          

Chen Shun Chew, Richmond resident;

·          

Gady Tse, Richmond resident;

·          

Will Siu, 5788 Gilbert Road;

·          

Alice Tang, Richmond resident;

·          

Emily Ying Lin, Richmond resident;

·          

Ted Yu Wang, Richmond resident;

·          

Janice Lui, Richmond resident;

·          

Celia Chio, Richmond resident;

·          

Corina Lee, Richmond resident;

·          

Frankie Tse, Richmond resident;

·          

Pico Cheung, Richmond resident;

·          

Noel Ho, Richmond resident;

·          

J Xie, Richmond resident;

·          

Henry Au, Richmond resident;

·          

Sam Leung, Richmond resident;

·          

Alex Sagert, Richmond resident;

·          

Albert Hu, Richmond resident; and

·          

Esther Leung, Richmond resident.

The following opposing comments were offered:

·          

There are safety concerns associated with the idea of a supervised consumption site (SCS);

·          

There is a lack of scientific evidence that SCS help save lives;

·          

SCS contribute to more overdose deaths;

·          

The number of overdose deaths in Richmond last year don’t warrant the need for a SCS;

·          

Many daycares and elementary schools are located near Richmond General Hospital;

·          

Online petition circulating has collected over 18,000 electronic signatures;

·          

Fear of increase in Richmond crime rates;

·          

There is concern with the safety of children who must walk past the site to attend school;

·          

The provision of a SCS is not a not a cost effective way to address the drug crisis;

·          

Harm reduction has failed drug users, business owners, families, children, and tax payers;

·          

Richmond will turn into another Chinatown;

·          

Drugs are a problem and can hurt people’s bodies and minds and it is hard to stop once you start;

·          

There is concern with the potential negative impacts to adjacent businesses;

·          

Should focus on stopping drug use and teach people about the dangers of drugs and help drug users get better;

·          

A safety plan has to be in place;

·          

A SCS will amplify the existing problems in the City Centre area since the beginning of the Alderbridge temporary modular housing lease;

·          

There is an online survey circulating with over 1,000 responses, the majority rejecting the idea;

·          

Harm reduction is just a band-aid solution;

·          

There is a need for public consultation; and

·          

There is a need to prioritize wraparound comprehensive services and teach prevention over harm reduction and safe supply in schools.

The following speakers spoke in favour:

·          

David Byres, Richmond resident;

·          

Debbie Tablotney, Richmond resident;

·          

Andrew Tablotney, Richmond resident;

·          

Leslie McBain, Co-founder, Moms Stop the Harm;

·          

Lisa Weigh, member of Moms Stop the Harm;

·          

Jesse Ferreras, Richmond resident;

·          

Guy Felicella, former Richmond resident;

·          

Daniel Remedios, Richmond resident; and

·          

Steven Mather, Richmond resident.

The following supporting comments were offered:

·          

Concerns of the Downtown Eastside are very different than Richmond;

·          

Evidence shows that SCS, including Insite, are safe and effective, and there have been no fatalities at Insite;

·          

The motion is to discuss the idea of a SCS with Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) and it is ultimately VCH’s decision;

·          

26 overdose deaths in Richmond is far too many;

·          

It is unlikely that people from the Downtown Eastside will be commuting to Richmond to use a SCS as there is already one in Vancouver;

·          

There have been no deaths at a SCS in Canada since its conception;

·          

Education is an important tool related to the stigma around drug addiction;

·          

There is a common theme of a lack of information and fear mongering;

·          

Many people who are experiencing drug addiction are also suffering from mental health issues;

·          

People need to be alive to take advantage of these services;

·          

Toxic drug poisonings do not just affect marginalized communities;

·          

Substance use is a disease, not a moral issue;

·          

Sites like Insite are shown to reduce tax costs due to reducing related infection rates at hospitals;

·          

Having a SCS reduces the number of deaths and calls for ambulance services; and

·          

SCS are a spark of hope.

Item No. 19 – Application by Lansdowne Phase 1 Limited Partnership For Rezoning at 5300 No. 3 Road From the “Auto-Oriented Commercial (CA)” Zone to the “Residential/Limited Commercial (ZMU55) – Lansdowne Village (City Centre)” Zone

Dan Cupa and Dea Knight, Bosa Properties, and Jesse Galicz, Vanprop, shared details of the Lansdowne Phase 1A development, highlighting the creation of nearly 300 units of rental housing, including 141 LEMR units and 157 market rental housing units, park space, and community amenity contributions. The delegation noted that (i) the application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, (ii) there will be opportunities for improvements at each phase of development, (iii) after receiving feedback from Planning Committee, they are able to bring forward ten new 3-bedroom units to the market rental housing and are proposing up to three eligible units of licensed family childcare, and (iv) in partnering with S.U.C.C.E.S.S., this will be the largest LEMR project ever to be delivered in Richmond and the largest supply of affordable housing operator run units in Richmond.

R24/3-3

It was moved and seconded

That the meeting be recessed and reconvened on Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, Richmond City Hall.

CARRIED

The meeting was recessed at 10:53 p.m.

The meeting reconvened on Tuesday, February 13, 2024, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Richmond City Hall, with all members of Council present.

The following speakers spoke in opposition:

·          

Cheryl see man Chiu, Richmond resident;

·          

Sally Kwan, Richmond resident;

·          

Amy Wei, Richmond resident;

·          

Susan Choi, Richmond resident;

·          

Tam Cook, Richmond resident;

·          

Richard Chong, Richmond resident;

·          

Aditya Chourasiya, Richmond resident;

·          

Boyu Lin, Richmond resident;

·          

David King, Richmond resident;

·          

April Wong, Richmond resident;

·          

Jennifer Huang, Richmond resident;

·          

Fion Lo, Richmond resident;

·          

Chiu M Cheung, Richmond resident;

·          

Lee Lee Lin, Richmond resident;

·          

Swimmy She, Richmond resident;

·          

Tyler Johnson, 958 W 8th Ave, Vancouver;

·          

Natalie Wong, Richmond resident;

·          

Phyllis Tang, former Richmond resident;

·          

Sally Yu, Richmond resident;

·          

Tac Jiang, Richmond resident;

·          

Dean Billings, Richmond resident;

·          

John Lee, Richmond resident;

·          

May Alvarez, Richmond resident;

·          

Andrew Mrozowski, Richmond resident;

·          

Sam Wang, Richmond resident;

·          

Joseph Wong, Richmond resident;

·          

Cathy Li, Richmond resident;

·          

Sina Lam, Richmond resident;

·          

Angela Ng, Richmond resident;

·          

Wen Fu Yang, Richmond resident;

·          

Chang Le Yu, Richmond resident;

·          

Mona Mao, Richmond resident;

·          

John Wong, Richmond resident; and

·          

Joy Yuan, Richmond resident.

The following opposing comments were offered:

·          

There is no guarantee that there would be no ‘honey pot’ effect;

·          

Belief that drug users should practice rehabilitation and detox;

·          

Perceived fear is a real problem;

·          

The number of drug-related deaths are rising and Vancouver supervised consumption and overdose prevention sites are not working;

·          

Concerns regarding increased property theft, vandalism, and threats to personal safety;

·          

Seniors that live in the area will be put at risk;

·          

Drug policies should prioritize prevention and rehabilitation; and

·          

SCS offer a false sense of security.

The following speakers spoke in favour:

·          

Trevor Tablotney, Richmond resident; and

·          

Mark Lee, Richmond resident.

The following supporting comments were offered:

·          

This situation is an example of a moral panic;

·          

There is a large misunderstanding and the community needs to be educated;

·          

Need to focus on destigmatizing the narrative on drug use and drug users;

·          

It is important to investigate whether or not there is a need; and

·          

Peer-reviewed studies have qualitative and quantitative data to support the effectiveness of SCS. 

Item No. 8 – London/Steveston Dog Off-Leash Area Update

Sergei Volpov, Richmond resident, expressed concerns regarding sound levels from the development of a new dog off-leash area.

R24/3-4

4.

It was moved and seconded

That Committee rise and report (10:09 p.m.).

CARRIED

CONSENT AGENDA

R24/3-5

5.

It was moved and seconded

That Items No. 6 through No. 16 be adopted by general consent.

CARRIED

6.

COMMITTEE MINUTES

That the minutes of:

(1)

the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Committee meeting held on January 30, 2024;

(2)

the General Purposes Committee meeting held on February 5, 2024;

(3)

the Finance Committee meeting held on February 5, 2024; and

(4)

the Planning Committee meeting held on February 6, 2024;

be received for information.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

7.

ADDITION OF NAMES TO THE RICHMOND CITY CENOTAPH
(File Ref. No. 06-2000-20-001) (REDMS No. 7578843)

(1)

That the City of Richmond acknowledge Canadian soldiers Private Hikotaro Koyanagi and Private Kazuo Harada and their sacrifice for Canada; and

(2)

That their names be appropriately added to the Richmond City Cenotaph in time for the National Civic Ceremony on November 11, 2024.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

8.

LONDON/STEVESTON DOG OFF-LEASH AREA UPDATE

(File Ref. No. 06-2345-20-LSTE1; 11-7200-20-DPAR1-02) (REDMS No. 7500768, 7500786, 7500792, 7500815, 7500811, 7584199)

(1)

That Option 1, as outlined in the staff report titled “London/Steveston Dog Off-Leash Area Update”, dated December 20, 2023, from the Director, Parks Services, be endorsed; and

(2)

That staff write a letter to the residents adjacent to the proposed off-leash area advising of the proposed options outlined in the staff report, before the next Council meeting.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

9.

AWARD OF CONTRACT 8239P – DELIVERY OF ADVANCED LIFEGUARDING, LIFESAVING AND FIRST AID INSTRUCTIONAL AND RECERTIFICATION COURSES

(File Ref. No. 03-1000-20-8239P) (REDMS No. 7431664)

(1)

That Contract 8239P – Delivery of Advanced Lifeguarding, Lifesaving and First Aid Instructional and Recertification Courses be awarded to L.I.T. Aquatics Ltd. for a three-year term for the projected contract value of $1,449,000 exclusive of taxes, as described in the report titled, “Award of Contract 8239P – Delivery of Advanced Lifeguarding, Lifesaving and First Aid Instructional and Recertification Courses”, dated January 2, 2024, from the Director, Recreation and Sport Services;

(2)

That the Chief Administrative Officer and the General Manager, Community Services, be authorized to extend the initial three-year term, up to the maximum total term of five years, for the maximum total amount of $2,415,000 exclusive of taxes, as described in the report titled, “Award of Contract 8239P – Delivery of Advanced Lifeguarding, Lifesaving and First Aid Instructional and Recertification Courses”, dated January 2,2024, from the Director, Recreation and Sport Services; and

(3)

That the Chief Administrative Officer and General Manager, Community Services, be authorized to execute the contract and all related documentation with L.I.T. Aquatics Ltd.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

10.

FIRST NATIONS BUNKHOUSE INTERPRETIVE PROGRAM AND LEVEL OF SERVICE

(File Ref. No. 11-7141-01; 06-2050-20-BSYD-LH) (REDMS No. 7373274, 7523156, 7523163, 7523648, 7523156, 7523180, 7523163, 7523648, 7523630, 7523178)

(1)

That the First Nations Bunkhouse Interpretive Program and Level of Service as detailed in the staff report titled “First Nations Bunkhouse Interpretive Program and Level of Service”, dated January 9, 2024, from the Director, Arts, Culture and Heritage Services and Director, Facilities and Project Development be approved;

(2)

That staff investigate the historical use of the building as a smokehouse;

(3)

That a joint committee of Council and Britannia Heritage Society members be formed to oversee the restoration; and

(4)

That the National Historical Sites and Monuments Board should be consulted on the restoration process.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

11.

AWARD OF CONTRACT 8259P – IT SECURITY - EXTENDED DETECTION AND RESPONSE (XDR)

(File Ref. No. 03-1000-20-8259P) (REDMS No. 7489418)

(1)

That contract 8259P – Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solution be awarded to Optiv Canada for an aggregate value of $534.813.30, exclusive of taxes for an initial contract term of three years, which includes an option to extend with the value of$478,376.50 at the end of the initial term for a further three years as described in the report titled “Award of Contract 8259P – IT Security - Extended Detection and Response (XDR)” dated January 2, 2024 from the Director, Information Technology; and

(2)

That the Chief Administrative Officer and the General Manager, Finance and Corporate Services be authorized to extend the initial three-year term up to the maximum total term of six years as described in the report “Award of Contract 8259P – IT Security -Extended Detection and Response (XDR),” dated January 2, 2024, from the Director, Information Technology; and

(3)

That the Chief Administrative Officer and the General Manager, Finance and Corporate Services be authorized to execute the contract amendment and all related documentation with Optiv Canada over the six-year term.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

12.

REVENUE ANTICIPATION BORROWING (2024) BYLAW NO. 10532

(File Ref. No. 12-8060-20-010532) (REDMS No. 7501395, 7501406)

That Revenue Anticipation Borrowing (2024) Bylaw No. 10532 be introduced and given first, second and third readings.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

13.

RICHMOND ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT 2023 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2024 WORK PROGRAM

(File Ref. No. 01-0100-30-ACEN1-01) (REDMS No. 7479227)

That the Richmond Advisory Committee on the Environment’s 2023 Annual Report and 2024 Work Program, as presented in the staff report titled “Richmond Advisory Committee on the Environment 2023 Annual Report and 2024 Work Program” dated January 9, 2024, from the Director of Policy Planning, be approved.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

14.

RICHMOND ACCESSIBILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2023 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2024 WORK PROGRAM
(File Ref. No. 01-0100-30-RACC1-01) (REDMS No. 7476143, 7486096, 7475038)

That the Richmond Accessibility Advisory Committee’s 2023 Annual Report and 2024 Work Program, as presented in the staff report titled “Richmond Accessibility Advisory Committee 2023 Annual Report and 2024 Work Program” dated January 4, 2024, from the Director of Community Social Development, be approved.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

15.

CHILD CARE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2023 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2024 WORK PROGRAM
(File Ref. No. 01-0100-30-CCDE1-01) (REDMS No. 7487416, 7484578, 7484838)

That the Child Care Development Advisory Committee’s 2023 Annual Report and 2024 Work Program, as outlined in the staff report titled, “Child Care Development Advisory Committee 2023 Annual Report and 2024 Work Program” dated January 3, 2024, from the Director, Community Social Development, be approved.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

16.

APPLICATION BY SHAWN LIU FOR REZONING AT 6660 FRANCIS ROAD FROM “SINGLE DETACHED (RS1/E)” ZONE TO THE “ARTERIAL ROAD TWO-UNIT DWELLINGS (RDA)” ZONE
(File Ref. No. 12-8060-20-010529, RZ 20-891129) (REDMS No. 7482815, 7521080)

That Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500, Amendment Bylaw 10529, for the rezoning of 6660 Francis Road from the “Single Detached (RS1/E)” zone to “Arterial Road Two-Unit Dwellings (RDA)” zone, be introduced and given first, second and third reading.

ADOPTED ON CONSENT

17.

APPLICATION BY MANSWELL ENTERPRISES LTD. FOR REZONING AT 9371 AND 9391 FRANCIS ROAD FROM THE “SINGLE DETACHED (RS1/C)” ZONE TO THE “LOW DENSITY TOWNHOUSES (RTL4)” ZONE
(File Ref. No. 12-8060-20-010527, RZ 22-005593) (REDMS No. 7332772, 7489547)

See Page 15 for action on this matter.

CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Councillor Bill McNulty, Chair

17.

APPLICATION BY MANSWELL ENTERPRISES LTD. FOR REZONING AT 9371 AND 9391 FRANCIS ROAD FROM THE “SINGLE DETACHED (RS1/C)” ZONE TO THE “LOW DENSITY TOWNHOUSES (RTL4)” ZONE

(File Ref. No. 12-8060-20-010527, RZ 22-005593) (REDMS No. 7332772, 7489547)

R24/3-6

It was moved and seconded

That Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500, Amendment Bylaw 10527, for the rezoning of 9371 and 9391 Francis Road from the “Single Detached (RS1/C)” zone to the “Low Density Townhouses (RTL4)” zone, be introduced and given first, second and third reading.

The question on the motion was not called as discussion ensued regarding variances and tree retention.

The question on the motion was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Gillanders and Wolfe opposed.

NON-CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS

GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE

Mayor Malcolm D. Brodie, Chair

18.

SUPERVISED CONSUMPTION SITE
(File Ref. No. 07-3000-03) (REDMS No. 7579158, 7578802, 7578777, 7575333, 7578770, 7575251, 7576321, 7576325, 7578715, 7578784, 7578769, 7578792, 7578759, 7575288, 7578765, 7579158, 7578739, 7583993, 7585052)

R24/3-7

It was moved and seconded

(1)

That Staff administer a practicability analysis to gauge the potential benefits and challenges of implementing a drug consumption site within the Richmond General Hospital Precinct. This analysis will evaluate the impact on public safety, healthcare costs, and community perceptions, providing evidence-based recommendations for the successful implementation of a supervised drug consumption site to address the growing public health crisis related to acute drug addiction and overdose deaths;

(2)

That staff collaborate with Coastal Health as the Authority responsible to fund and provide services onsite, both the Provincial and Federal Governments, local healthcare providers, and community organizations in establishing the drug consumption site. This collaboration will ensure that individuals accessing these sites receive comprehensive care, including access to addiction treatment, harm minimization services, and counseling;

(3)

That staff recommend to Council a process to establish a task force comprised of representatives from law enforcement, legal services, healthcare professionals, community organizations, and individuals with lived experience of drug addiction to develop guidelines, protocols, and best practices for the implementation of the drug consumption site, ensuring its effectiveness, acceptance, and safety;

(4)

That staff recommend to Council the resources required for community education and awareness campaigns about supervised drug consumption sites. These campaigns will aim to dispel misconceptions, reduce stigma, and promote understanding of the public health benefits associated with these sites;

(5)

That staff recommend to Council a monitoring and evaluation system to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of the drug consumption site. This system will collect data on overdose rates, healthcare utilization, and referrals to addiction treatment, allowing Council  to make informed decisions about the future of this site; and

(6)

That staff develop a process to ensure that community concerns and perspectives are considered during the planning and implementation process.

The question on the motion was not called as discussion ensued regarding (i) the misunderstanding of the concept of a supervised consumption site (SCS) and the details of the motion and process involved, (ii) the increase in drug toxicity levels and people experiencing homelessness, (iii) improvements to public safety, (iv) future public engagement if and when the SCS is brought forward, and (v) harm reduction services as part of a comprehensive public health and addictions program that includes both prevention and treatment.

R24/3-8

It was moved and seconded

That the item “Supervised Consumption Site” be tabled.

DEFEATED
Opposed: Mayor Brodie
Cllrs. Day
Gillanders
Heed
Hobbs
McNulty
Wolfe

Further discussion ensued regarding (i) the need for further consultation and public engagement, (ii) the stigma surrounding drug use and the importance of education and support, (iii) the difference between a supervised consumption site and an overdose prevention site, and (iv) crime and overdose statistics in Richmond.

R24/3-9

It was moved and seconded

That the Council meeting of February 13, 2024 proceed past 11:00 p.m.

CARRIED

Further discussion ensued regarding (i) the connection between mental health, housing, health care and medical services, (ii) the increase in deaths related to toxic drugs, (iii) the eventual need for this type of harm reduction resource, and (iv) the emphasis on the meaning of the motion and the possible timeline.

The question on the motion was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Au and Loo opposed.

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Councillor Bill McNulty, Chair

19.

APPLICATION BY LANSDOWNE PHASE 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR REZONING AT 5300 NO. 3 ROAD FROM THE “AUTO-ORIENTED COMMERCIAL (CA)” ZONE TO THE “RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED COMMERCIAL (ZMU55) – LANSDOWNE VILLAGE (CITY CENTRE)” ZONE

(File Ref. No. 12-8060-20-010523, RZ 23-011557; 12-8060-20-010511) (REDMS No. 7460688, 7444554, 7536337, 7533872, 7575355, 7575351, 7578739, 7575339, 7575344, 7575339, 7567042, 7571385, 7584052)

R24/3-10

It was moved and seconded

(1)

That Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 7100, Amendment Bylaw 10523 to amend Section 2.33 map entitled “Pedestrian Environment Map (2031)”, Section 2.5.1 map entitled “A Base for Building a Living Landscape Map”, Section 2.6 map entitled “Base Level Parks & Open Space Map (2031)”, subsection 2.6.3(c) map entitled “Pedestrian Linkages Map”, subsection 3.1.3(c) (Pedestrian Linkages) map entitled “Designated Green Link & Linear Park Location Map”, and Section 3.3.2 Special Precinct 2.0 plan entitled “Special Precinct Character Areas & Major Park and Public Open Space Plan”, to move the North-South “Minor Green Link” east of Cooney Road identified in the OCP Lansdowne Village (City Centre), to along the west side of Kwantlen Street, be introduced and given first reading;

(2)

That Bylaw 10523, having been considered in conjunction with:

·          

the City’s Financial Plan and Capital Program;

·          

the Greater Vancouver Regional District Solid Waste and Liquid Waste Management Plans; is hereby found to be consistent with said program and plans, in accordance with Section 477(3)(a) of the Local Government Act;

(3)

That Bylaw 10523, having been considered in accordance with OCP Bylaw Preparation Consultation Policy 5043, is hereby found not to require further consultation; and

(4)

That Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500, Amendment Bylaw 10511 to create the “Residential/Limited Commercial (ZMU55) – Lansdowne Village (City Centre)” zone, and to rezone a portion of 5300 No.3 Road from “Auto-Oriented Commercial (CA)” to “Residential/Limited Commercial (ZMU55) – Lansdowne Village (City Centre)” zone, be introduced and given first reading, subject to the revised Rezoning considerations included as Attachment 1 to the memo from the Director of Development dated February 9, 2024.

The question on the motion was not called as discussion ensued regarding    (i) community use and benefits from the development, (ii) the form and character of the proposed development, (iii) the OCP and City Centre Area Plan, and (iv) the need for more housing and family-friendly units.

The question on the motion was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Day, Gillanders, and Wolfe opposed.

The following referral motion was introduced:

R24/3-11

It was moved and seconded

That staff bring forward the Lansdowne Master Plan for a discussion whether further revisions are required.

CARRIED

BYLAWS FOR ADOPTION

R24/3-12

It was moved and seconded

That Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 10219 be adopted.

CARRIED

Opposed: Cllrs. Gillanders
Wolfe

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PANEL

R24/3-13

20.

It was moved and seconded

(1)

That the minutes and the Chair’s report for the Development Permit Panel meeting held on February 15, 2023, be received for information.

(2)

That the recommendations of the Panel to authorize the issuance of Development Permit (DP 21-933765) for the properties at 9300 and 9320 Cambie Road, be endorsed and the Permit so issued.

CARRIED

ADJOURNMENT

R24/3-14

It was moved and seconded

That the meeting adjourn (11:48 p.m.).

CARRIED

Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the Regular meeting of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Monday, February 12, 2024 and Tuesday, February 13, 2024.

_________________________________

_________________________________

Mayor (Malcolm D. Brodie)

Corporate Officer (Claudia Jesson)