November 27, 2017 - Minutes
Regular Council
Monday, November 27, 2017
Place: |
Council Chambers |
Present: |
Mayor Malcolm D. Brodie |
Call to Order: |
Mayor Brodie called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. |
RES NO. |
ITEM |
|
|
|
MINUTES |
R17/20-1 |
1. |
It was moved and seconded |
||
|
|
That: |
||
|
|
(1) |
the minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on November 14, 2017, be adopted as circulated; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
the minutes of the Regular Council meeting for Public Hearings held on November 20, 2017, be adopted as circulated. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
AGENDA ADDITIONS & DELETIONS |
|
|
That Part (4) be added to Item No. 22 and read “That the above recommendations and staff report be forwarded to the Council/School Board Liaison Committee.” |
|
|
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE |
R17/20-2 |
2. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on agenda items (7:02 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
3. |
Item No. 8 – Minoru Place Activity Centre Reuse Options |
|
|
A letter from the Richmond Arts Coalition, dated February 17, 2017, was distributed on table (copy on-file, City Clerk’s Office). |
|
|
Linda Barnes and Rob Fillo, representing the Richmond Arts Coalition, spoke in support of repurposing the Minoru Place Activity Centre and expressed that currently available arts programming space is insufficient for the city’s population and demand for arts programs. It was further noted that although the City works with the arts community in prioritizing programs, it should examine options to expand available art programming space in the future. |
|
|
Item No. 22 – Amendments to Local Election Campaign Financing Legislation |
|
|
Kelly Greene, Richmond resident, spoke on proposed limitations to fundraising and spending for slate candidates in comparison to independent candidates and expressed concern that the proposal to apply tax deductions for donations to municipal campaigns would increase costs to taxpayers. |
|
|
Item No. 23 – Proposed Changes: Steveston Area Plan, Village Heritage Conservation Policies, Design Guidelines and Long-Term Bayview, Moncton and Chatham Street Visions |
|
|
Lorne Slye, 11911 3rd Avenue, expressed concern that the proposed changes to the Steveston Area Plan may negatively affect in-stream development applications along the waterfront. |
|
|
Item No. 23 – Proposed Changes: Steveston Area Plan, Village Heritage Conservation Policies, Design Guidelines and Long-Term Bayview, Moncton and Chatham Street Visions |
|
|
Ken Chow, Architect, expressed concern regarding the proposed changes to the Steveston Area Plan, noting that he is currently working on a development in Steveston and the proposed changes may render the project economically unfeasible. |
R17/20-3 |
4. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Committee rise and report (7:25 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
CONSENT AGENDA |
R17/20-4 |
5. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Items No. 6 through No. 21 be adopted by general consent. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
6. |
COMMITTEE MINUTES
|
|
|
|
That the minutes of: |
|
||
|
(1) |
the Special General Purposes Committee meeting held on November 14, 2017; |
|
|
|
(2) |
the Community Safety Committee meeting held on November 15, 2017; |
|
|
|
(3) |
the General Purposes Committee meeting held on November 20, 2017; |
|
|
|
(4) |
the Planning Committee meeting held on November 21, 2017; |
|
|
|
(5) |
the Public Works and Transportation Committee meeting held on November 22, 2017; and |
|
|
|
(6) |
the Council/School Board Liaison Committee meeting held on November 8, 2017; |
|
|
|
be received for information. |
|
||
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
7. |
RCMP Monthly Activity Report - September 2017 |
|
|
That a letter be written to the Vancouver Airport Authority to review RCMP staff resources required to accommodate the increase in volume through Vancouver Airport. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
8. |
Minoru Place Activity Centre Reuse Options |
|
|
|
(1) |
That the recommended option, Option 1: Community Education and Arts Space, be approved as the preferred reuse of the Minoru Place Activity Centre as detailed in the staff report titled “Minoru Place Activity Centre Reuse Options,” dated October 31, 2017, from the Interim Director, Parks and Recreation; |
|
|
(2) |
That the recommended option, Option 1: Community Education and Arts Space, be considered as part of the Minoru Park Vision Plan, as detailed in the staff report titled “Minoru Place Activity Centre Reuse Options,” dated October 31, 2017, from the Interim Director, Parks and Recreation; and |
|
|
(3) |
That staff consider the financing for the use and restoration of the Minoru Place Activity Centre, the specific uses within community education and arts usage of the building, and accommodating other community groups with space needs. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
9. |
2018 Age-Friendly Communities Grant Submission |
|
|
|
(1) |
That the application to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) 2018 Age-friendly Communities Grant Program for $25,000 in the Age-friendly Assessments, Action Plans and Planning Category be endorsed; and |
|
|
(2) |
That, should the funding application be successful, the Chief Administrative Officer and a General Manager be authorized to enter into agreement with the UBCM for the above mentioned project and the 5-Year Financial Plan (2018-2022) be updated accordingly. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
10. |
proposed taxation framework for cannabis products |
|
|
That the comments summarized in the staff report titled, “Proposed Taxation Framework for Cannabis Products”, dated November 16, 2017, including that the municipal share of revenue be no less than 50 cents per gram, be approved for submission to the federal government. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
11. |
Election Reserve and Advance Planning for the 2018 Election |
||
|
|
(1) |
That a divisional-voting approach to the 2018 election, which is consistent with the current Civic Election Administration and Procedure Bylaw, and as generally described in the staff report dated November 3, 2017 from the Director, City Clerk’s Office, be approved; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
That the following additional level requests be considered as part of the 2018 budget process: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
a one-time additional level request in the amount of $130,000 for the 2018 election, and |
|
|
|
(b) |
an ongoing additional level request in the amount of $45,000 to increase the annual Election Reserve transfer for the 2018 election and for future elections; |
|
|
(3) |
That the above recommendations and staff report be forwarded to the Council/School Board Liaison Committee. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
12. |
Richmond Intercultural Advisory Committee - Terms of Reference Update |
|
|
That the proposed updated Richmond Intercultural Advisory Committee (RIAC) Terms of Reference be endorsed as presented in the staff report titled “Richmond Intercultural Advisory Committee – Terms of Reference Update,” dated October 25, 2017 from the General Manager, Community Services. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
13. |
Application by Ken Phuah for Rezoning at 10011 Seacote Road from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” Zone to “Compact Single Detached (RC2)” Zone |
|
|
That Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500, Amendment Bylaw 9788, for the rezoning of 10011 Seacote Road from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” zone to “Compact Single Detached (RC2)” zone, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
14. |
Application by Raj Dhaliwal for Rezoning at 10460 Williams Road from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” Zone to “Compact Single Detached (RC2)” Zone |
|
|
That Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500, Amendment Bylaw 9789, for the rezoning of 10460 Williams Road from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” zone to “Compact Single Detached (RC2)” zone, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
15. |
City of Richmond-TransLink TravelSmart Partnership – Completion of Pilot Program |
|
|
|
(1) |
That the staff report titled “City of Richmond-TransLink TravelSmart Partnership – Completion of Pilot Program”, dated October 20, 2017, from the Director, Transportation be received for information; and |
|
|
(2) |
That a copy of the above report be forwarded to the Richmond Council-School Board Liaison Committee for information. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
16. |
TransLink Southwest Area Transport Plan – Results of Phase 2 Consultation and Preparation of Draft Final Plan |
||
|
|
(1) |
That as described in the report titled “TransLink Southwest Area Transport Plan – Results of Phase 2 Consultation and Preparation of Draft Final Plan” dated November 1, 2017 from the Director, Transportation: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The comments from the Senior Advisory Committee and staff be forwarded to TransLink staff for incorporation into the draft final Plan; and |
|
|
|
(b) |
TransLink’s draft recommendations for transit service and regionally significant cycling corridors for the Southwest Area Transport Plan be endorsed for the purpose of public consultation on the draft final TransLink Southwest Area Transport Plan. |
|
|
(2) |
That staff be directed to report back with the draft final TransLink Southwest Area Transport Plan in January 2018. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
17. |
Burkeville Drainage |
|
|
That a moratorium on ditch infills in the Burkeville neighbourhood, until a piped drainage network is implemented as outlined in the report titled “Burkeville Drainage” dated October 27, 2017, from the Director, Engineering, be endorsed. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
18. |
2017 UNION OF BC MUNICIPALITIES COMMUNITY EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUND |
|
|
|
(1) |
That the Dike Master Plan Phase 5 submission to the 2017 Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM) Community Emergency Preparedness Fund be endorsed; and |
|
|
(2) |
That should the Dike Master Plan Phase 5 submission be successful, the Chief Administrative Officer and General Manager, Engineering and Public Works be authorized to negotiate and execute the funding agreements with UBCM. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
19. |
Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure - Requirements for New Developments |
||
|
|
(1) |
That Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9756, which adds Section 7.15 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure, identified in the report titled “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure – Requirements for New Developments” dated October 15, 2017, from the Director, Engineering, be introduced and given first reading; |
|
|
|
(2) |
That Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 9000, Amendment Bylaw No. 9520, which amends Section 8.5 Transportation Capacity and Demand Management and Section 14.2.7.E Electric Vehicle Charging both regarding electric vehicles, identified in the report titled “Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure – Requirements for New Developments” dated October 15, 2017, from the Director, Engineering, be introduced and given first reading; |
|
|
|
(3) |
That Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 9000, Amendment Bylaw No. 9520, having been considered in conjunction with: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The City’s Financial Plan and Capital Program; and |
|
|
|
(b) |
The Greater Vancouver Regional District Solid Waste and Liquid Waste Management Plans; |
|
|
|
is hereby found to be consistent with said programs and plans, in accordance with Section 477(3)(a) of the Local Government Act; and |
|
|
|
(4) |
That Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 9000, Amendment Bylaw No. 9520, having been considered in accordance with Official Community Plan Bylaw Preparation Consultation Policy 5043, is hereby found not to require further consultation. |
|
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
20. |
OVAL VILLAGE DISTRICT ENERGY UTILITY BYLAW NO. 9134, AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 9778 |
|
|
|
(1) |
That the staff recommendation to amend the Oval Village District Energy Utility rate for services as presented in Option 2 of the report titled “Oval Village District Energy Utility Bylaw No. 9134, Amendment Bylaw No. 9778” be endorsed; and |
|
|
(2) |
That the Oval Village District Energy Utility Bylaw No. 9134, Amendment Bylaw No. 9778 be introduced and given first, second and third readings. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
21. |
ALEXANDRA DISTRICT ENERGY UTILITY BYLAW NO. 8641, AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 9777 |
|
|
|
(1) |
That the staff recommendation to amend the Alexandra District Energy Utility rate for services as presented in Option 2 of the report titled “Alexandra District Energy Utility Bylaw No. 8641, Amendment Bylaw No. 9777” be endorsed; and |
|
|
(2) |
That the Alexandra District Energy Utility Bylaw No. 8641, Amendment Bylaw No. 9777 be introduced and given first, second and third readings. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
NON-CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS |
|
|
GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE – |
|
22. |
Amendments to Local Election Campaign Financing Legislation |
||||
R17/20-5 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
||||
|
|
That a letter be written to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, with copies to Elections BC, Richmond MLAs, UBCM, and Richmond School Board, commenting on municipal election financing that: |
||||
|
|
(1) |
under Bill 15, Local Elections Campaign Financing Amendment Act (2017): |
|
||
|
|
|
(a) |
for fundraising events: |
||
|
|
|
|
(i) |
there should be a distinction between a donation and the costs incurred for a fundraising event so that a donation is only that portion of a payment which exceeds the costs incurred to host the fundraiser; and |
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
clarification of the treatment of funds raised through fundraisers within an event such as raffles, draws, auctions, etc; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
provide clarification as to how and by whom the determination is made as to who qualifies as an eligible individual for the purpose of making a campaign donation; |
||
|
|
|
(c) |
remedy the unfairness in the proposed limitations on fundraising and spending for a slate of candidates versus an independent candidate; and |
||
|
|
|
(d) |
provide clarification of the retroactivity for the new rules under Bill 15; |
||
|
|
(2) |
under the Local Elections Campaign Financing Act, remedy the unfairness in the rules on disposition of surplus funds following an election for an independent candidate versus the rules on disposition for an Elector Organization; |
|||
|
|
(3) |
tax deductions for donations to municipal campaigns should be provided, similar to campaign donations for Provincial and Federal elections; and |
|||
|
|
(4) |
That the above recommendations and staff report be forwarded to the Council/School Board Liaison Committee. |
|||
|
|
The question on Resolution R17/20-5 was not called as discussion ensued with regard to (i) the use of net revenue calculations for fundraising events, (ii) the regulations related to funding limits, spending limits and surplus funds for independent candidates compared to elector organizations, (iii) the incorporation of tax deductions for donors to municipal election campaigns, and (iv) the introduction of spending limits for elector organizations. |
||||
|
|
In reply to queries from Council, David Weber, Director, City Clerk's Office, noted that candidates running under an elector organization may designate their portion of their spending limit to the elector organization to be spent by the elector organization on their behalf. Also, he noted that individuals are limited to a maximum donation of $1,200 per year to independent candidates or elector organizations. |
||||
|
|
Discussion further ensued regarding receiving clarification from the Province on spending limits for elector organizations. As a result, the following amendment was introduced: |
||||
R17/20-6 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
||||
|
|
That Part 1(c) be amended to read the following: “remedy the unfairness in the proposed limitations on fundraising and spending for a slate of candidates versus an independent candidate and amend the cap limit for slates to the equivalent of two candidates.” |
||||
|
|
The question on Resolution R17/20-6 was not called as further discussion ensued with regard to the maximum spending limits of independent candidates compared to elector organizations and utilizing a sliding scale to set those limits. |
||||
|
|
The question on Resolution R17/20-6 was then called and it was DEFEATED with Mayor Brodie and Cllrs. Au, Dang, Johnston, Loo, McNulty, McPhail, and Steves opposed. |
||||
|
|
As a result of the discussion, the following referral was introduced: |
||||
R17/20-7 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
||||
|
|
That issues raised by Part 1(c) of the letter to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be further examined by staff for specific analysis and report back. |
||||
|
|
CARRIED |
||||
|
|
The question on the main motion, Resolution R17/20-5, was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllr. Day opposed. |
||||
|
|
PLANNING COMMITTEE – |
|
23. |
Proposed Changes: Steveston Area Plan, Village Heritage Conservation Policies, Design Guidelines and Long-Term Bayview, Moncton and Chatham Street Visions |
|
||
R17/20-8 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|||
|
|
(1) |
That staff be directed to: |
||
|
|
|
(a) |
incorporate both the “Sakamoto Guidelines for Area Revitalization (1987)” and “Sakamoto Guidelines for Façade Improvements (1989)” in their entirety, into the Steveston Area Plan; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
incorporate design guidelines that would require solid non-transparent barrier railings for rooftop structures; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
incorporate design guidelines that would restrict the use of brick only for the replacement of existing brick façades throughout the Village; and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
remove the proposed policy to establish a bridge connection to the Gulf of Georgia site; |
|
|
|
|
and to make the necessary changes to Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 7100, Amendment Bylaw 9775; |
||
|
|
(2) |
That new developments in the Riverfront Area south of Bayview Street be restricted to a maximum of two storeys and a maximum density of 1.2 FAR; |
||
|
|
(3) |
That the recommended long-term Bayview, Moncton and Chatham Street Streetscape visions be referred back to staff for further investigation and future reporting on issues related to details of the streetscape elements, the Steveston interurban tram and an upgraded Steveston bus exchange; and |
||
|
|
(4) |
That each of the following bylaws be introduced and given first reading: |
||
|
|
|
(a) |
Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 7100, Amendment Bylaw 9775; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Richmond Official Community Plan Bylaw 7100, Amendment Bylaw 9797. |
|
|
|
The question on Resolution R17/20-8 was not called as discussion ensued with regard to (i) the consideration of in-stream applications along the Steveston waterfront under the existing bylaws, (ii) the process to consider variances to height and density, (iii) the public consultation process, (iv) the maintenance of public access to the waterfront, and (iv) the maintenance of accessibility in new developments. |
|||
|
|
The question on Resolution R17/20-8 was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllr. Loo opposed. |
|||
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That in-stream development applications in the Steveston Area be grandfathered under the existing bylaws. |
|
|
The question on Resolution R17/20-9 was not called as discussion ensued with regard to the current number of in-stream applications and Wayne Craig, Director, Development, advised that only one development application (located on 3880 Bayview Street) would contravene the proposed changes to the Steveston Area Plan. |
|
|
As a result of the discussion the following referral was introduced: |
R17/20-9 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the question of whether to consider the in-stream development application for 3880 Bayview Street to be grandfathered under the existing bylaws be referred to staff for consideration in conjunction with the application and report back. |
|
|
The question on the referral motion, R17/20-9, was not called as discussion ensued with regard to waterfront development in Steveston. |
|
|
The question on R17/20-9 was then called and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Day, Loo McNulty and Steves opposed. |
|
|
PUBLIC DELEGATIONS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS |
R17/20-10 |
24. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on non‑agenda items (8:56 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
With the aid of a PowerPoint presentation (copy on-file, City Clerk’s Office), John Irving, Director, Engineering, spoke on the sanitary sewer replacement and paved lane construction between Richmond Street and Broadway Street, noting the following: |
|
|
|
§ |
the replacement of the failed sewer main has commenced; |
|
|
§ |
the City does not actively monitor illegal encroachments and illegal encroachments are only removed when safety issues are identified or to facilitate the construction or maintenance of public infrastructure; |
|
|
§ |
there is no City policy to allow permanent encroachments; |
|
|
§ |
easements or statutory right-of-ways (SRWs) differ from road dedications in that easements and SRWs place an encumbrance on the private property that allows specific uses, while the underlying property rights are retained by the owner, compared to a road dedication where the owner does not retain any private property rights; |
|
|
§ |
the City has no plans to open laneways on easements or SRWs; and |
|
|
§ |
the City has conducted public open houses and have sought input on the finished laneway features from affected residents. |
|
|
|
Cllr. Johnston left the meeting (8:58 p.m.) and returned (8:59 p.m.). |
|
|
|
Cllr. Au left the meeting (9:06 p.m.) and returned (9:08 p.m.). |
|
Sewer repair and Laneway Construction between Richmond Street and Broadway Street |
|
|
(1) |
Chris Back, Richmond resident, read from his submission (attached to and forming part of these minutes as Schedule 1), and spoke against the proposed construction of a laneway between Richmond Street and Broadway Street. |
|
|
In reply to queries from Council, staff noted that there are no City policies that contradict the construction of the proposed laneway. |
|
(2) |
With the aid of a PowerPoint presentation (copy on-file, City Clerk’s Office), Karen Smith, Richmond resident, read from her submission (attached to and forming part of these minutes as Schedule 1) and expressed concern that the proposed laneway may have a negative impact on traffic safety in the neighbourhood. |
|
(3) |
Tim Major, Richmond resident, read from his submission (attached to and forming part of these minutes as Schedule 1) expressed that the proposed laneway may have a negative impact on green space in the area. He suggested that that a greenway may be an alternative to the proposed laneway. |
|
(4) |
Kent Goodhew, Richmond resident, read from his submission (attached to and forming part of these minutes as Schedule 1) and expressed concern with regard to the public consultation process. |
|
(5) |
Rob Hulyk, Richmond resident, referenced his submission (attached to and forming part of these minutes as Schedule 1) and expressed that the proposed laneway may have a negative impact on traffic in the area. Also, he commented on potential alternatives to paved laneways that other cities have adopted. |
|
(6) |
Vito Albanese, Richmond resident, read from his submission (attached to and forming part of these minutes as Schedule 1) and expressed that the proposed laneway may negatively affect green space and traffic in the area. |
R17/20-11 |
25. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Committee rise and report (9:48 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
|
Cllr. Steves left the meeting (9:48 p.m.) and returned (9:50 p.m.). |
|
|
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS AND EVENTS |
|
|
Mayor Brodie announced the following 2018 Advisory Committee appointments: |
|
|
|
Economic Advisory Committee |
|
|
|
Two-Year Term to expire on December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
§ |
Parm Sandhu (Chair) |
|
|
§ |
Yasmin Ali |
|
|
§ |
Gilles Assier |
|
|
§ |
Patrick Caffrey |
|
|
§ |
Dave Frank |
|
|
§ |
Shikha Sondhi |
|
|
§ |
Alfred Wong |
|
|
§ |
Michael Priest |
|
|
Richmond Intercultural Advisory Committee |
|
|
|
Two-Year Term to expire on December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
§ |
Joan Page |
|
|
§ |
Naresh (Nick) Chopra |
|
|
§ |
Rod Belleza |
|
|
§ |
Nigel Pronger |
|
|
§ |
Diane Sugars |
|
|
§ |
Ashok Rattan |
|
|
Child Care Development Advisory Committee |
|
|
|
Two-Year Term to expire on December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
§ |
Daan Kaur Matharu |
|
|
§ |
Adam Picotte |
|
|
§ |
Lucia Rincon |
|
|
§ |
Ofra Sixto |
|
|
Advisory Design Panel |
|
|
|
Two-Year Term to expire on December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
§ |
Greg Andrews |
|
|
§ |
Mona Lovgreen |
|
|
§ |
Sheng Zhao |
|
|
YVR Aeronautical Noise Management Committee |
|
|
|
Two-Year Term to expire on December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
§ |
Gary Abrams |
|
|
NEW BUSINESS |
|
|
Cllr. Day moved a motion that the lane policy for perpendicular lanes be reviewed. |
|
|
Mayor Brodie ruled that the motion was out of order. |
|
|
Cllr. Day called for a Point of Order and challenged the Chair’s ruling. |
|
|
In accordance with procedure, the Mayor put the following question to Council “Is the Chair to be sustained?” |
|
|
The question as to whether the Chair is to be sustained was called and it was CARRIED with Cllr. Day opposed. |
|
|
BYLAWS FOR ADOPTION |
R17/20-12 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the following bylaws be adopted: |
|
|
Business Licence Bylaw No. 7360, Amendment Bylaw No. 9763 |
|
|
Waterworks and Water Rates Bylaw No. 5637, Amendment Bylaw No. 9781 |
|
|
Drainage, Dyke and Sanitary Sewer Bylaw No. 7551, Amendment Bylaw No. 9782 |
|
|
Waterworks and Water Rates Bylaw No. 5637, Amendment Bylaw No. 9785 |
|
|
Solid Waste & Recycling Regulation Bylaw No. 6803, Amendment Bylaw No. 9791 |
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9557 |
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9579 (3360/3380 Blundell Road, RZ 15-710447) |
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9621 |
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9744 |
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9746 |
|
|
Richmond Zoning Bylaw No. 8500, Amendment Bylaw No. 9748 |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
R17/20-13 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (9:54 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the Regular meeting of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Monday, November 27, 2017. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Mayor (Malcolm D. Brodie) |
Corporate Officer (David Weber) |