April 25, 2005 Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
Monday, April 25th, 2005
Time: |
7:00 p.m. |
Place: |
Council Chambers |
Present: |
Mayor Malcolm D. Brodie Acting City Clerk – David Weber |
Call to Order: |
Mayor Brodie called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. |
RES NO. |
ITEM |
|
|
|
MINUTES |
R05/8-1 |
1. |
It was moved and seconded | ||
|
|
That: | ||
|
|
(1) |
the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held on Monday, April 11th, 2005; and |
|
|
|
(2) |
the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting for Public Hearings held on Monday, April 18th, 2005, |
|
|
|
each be adopted as circulated. | ||
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
AGENDA ADDITIONS & DELETIONS |
R05/8-2 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Item No. 20 – “Richmond’s Regional Context Statement Review” be deleted from the Council Agenda. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
BUSINESS LICENCE SUSPENSION HEARINGS |
|
2. |
SUSPENSION OF BUSINESS LICENCE – QK KARAOKE BOX |
|
|
Opportunity for Business Licence Holder to be heard in accordance with Section 60 of the Community Charter – Gary Ng, principal of the business. |
|
|
Mr. Alfred Woo, representing Mr. Gary Ng, who was also present, advised that his client had operated QK Karaoke Box at its present location for the past nine years without any problems arising. He explained that it was only in this year, with the hiring of a particular employee that bylaw violations began to occur. Mr. Woo advised that following the fifth contravention, Mr. Ng confronted the employee about the bylaw violations and this person was immediately fired. |
|
|
Mr. Woo stated that Mr. Ng was not contesting the allegations and recognized that he, as the owner and principal director of the business, was responsible for not only the conduct of his business but also for the conduct of his employees. Mr. Woo further stated that the karaoke business was a difficult business which catered to patrons who could be under the influence of alcohol, some of whom challenged management when faced with an order to cease a particular activity on the premises. He explained that the employee in question allowed patrons to consume alcohol and smoke within the premises. Mr. Woo advised that in the past, Mr. Ng had called the RCMP to evict undesirable patrons, and added that Mr. Ng was also prepared to evict these persons. |
|
|
Mr. Woo stated that his client had already suffered sufficient notoriety and punishment as a result of an inaccurately reported article in the Vancouver Sun (which had picked the news item up from the Richmond News), which indicated that Council, on April 11th, 2005, had suspended Mr. Ng’s business licence for twenty days. (A copy of the news article was circulated to members of Council and is on file in the City Clerk’s Office.) Mr. Woo noted that his client’s business had suffered drastically as a result of this article. Reference was made to a statement in the staff report about unpaid fines, and Mr. Woo advised that his client had now paid all of these fines. |
|
|
In concluding his presentation, Mr. Woo asked that Council either take no action to approve the proposed business licence suspension; or reduce the period of the suspension to a shorter length of time, as he felt that his client had had sufficient punishment. |
R05/8-3 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the business licences of company 521067 BC Ltd. doing business as QK Karaoke Box operating from premises located at Unit #230 – 4231 Hazelbridge Way, be suspended for a period of 20 days commencing May 2 through to May 21, 2005,both dates inclusive. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE |
R05/8-4 |
3. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on agenda items (7:15 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
4. |
Delegations from the floor on Agenda items – |
|
|
Item No. 8 – Change in the Relationship between the City and the RCMP Detachment |
|
|
The Manager, Policy Development & Corporate Programs, Shawn Issel, provided a brief overview of the report being considered this evening. Ms. Issel then introduced RCMP Commanding Officer - Deputy Commissioner Bev Busson. |
|
|
Deputy Commissioner Bev Busson spoke further on the improvement in the relationship between the City and the RCMP; how this improvement came about; the excellent calibre of the officers and members of the Richmond Detachment; and the partnerships which currently exist between the City and the Detachment. |
|
|
Item No. 14 – Licensee Retail Stores And Liquor Primary Establishments |
|
|
Ms. Carol Day, of Seahurst Road, spoke in support of conducting mandatory neighbourhood surveys which she felt were critical when obtaining the opinions of local residents about the possible location of a liquor establishment within their areas. She suggested that the words “at the discretion of Council” (as shown in Part (5)(b)(2)(c) of the proposed resolution), should be deleted. |
|
|
Mr. Norman Wrigglesworth, of No. 1 Road, stated that all neighbourhood pubs should be permanently closed, and spoke about the problems caused by youth who were drinking illegally. He also indicated that he supported the views given by Ms. Carol Day about the need for neighbourhood surveys. |
|
|
Mr. James Day, of 11631 Seahurst Road, spoke about the rights of Richmond residents, and about maintaining the status quo with respect to the holding of neighbourhood surveys as they related to the locating of liquor establishments within their neighbourhoods. |
|
|
Ms. Susan Worfolk, 10691 Seamount Road, spoke in support of allowing Richmond residents to have an opportunity to voice their opinions on the establishment of neighbourhood public houses or other liquor establishments within their neighbourhoods. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hugh Murray, of 10040 Hollymount Drive, expressed concern about the multi-family development proposed for the area, advising that the project was premature as he felt that the proposed three storey complex would not be compatible with the surrounding single-family residences. |
R05/8-5 |
5. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Committee rise and report (8:21 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
REGULAR (CLOSED) COUNCIL |
|
6. |
APPOINTMENT OF NEW CITY CLERK | |
R05/8-6 |
|
It was moved and seconded | |
|
|
(1) |
That Mr. David Weber be appointed as the municipal officer responsible for corporate administration in accordance with Section 148 of the Community Charter, effective April 29th, 2005. |
|
|
(2) |
That Officer and General Manager Bylaw No 7407, Amendment Bylaw No. 7937, which updates the title of “City Clerk” to “Director, City Clerk’s Office” be introduced and given first, second and third readings. |
|
|
(3) |
That staff bring forward appropriate amendments to other city bylaws to effect this change to the title “City Clerk”, as and when such other city bylaws are being amended. |
|
|
(4) |
That a formal vote of thanks be extended to Mr. Richard McKenna for his dedication and commitment to the City. |
|
|
Prior to the question being called on Resolution No. R05/8-6, Council members offered their congratulations and best wishes to retiring City Clerk Richard McKenna. |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-6 was then called, and it was CARRIED. |
|
|
(Councillor Howard left the meeting at 8:31 p.m.) |
|
|
COMMUNITY SAFETY COMMITTEE – |
R05/8-7 |
7. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the Community Safety Committee meeting held on Tuesday, April 12th, 2005, be received for information. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
8. |
CHANGE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE CITY’S RCMP DETACHMENT (Report: Mar. 23/05, File No.: 09-5355-01) (REDMS No. 1462397) |
R05/8-8 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the report (dated March 23rd, 2005, from the Chief Administrative Officer) regarding the changes in the relationship between the City and the City’s RCMP Detachment, be received for information, and forwarded to the Lower Mainland District Officer and the Commanding Officer “E” Division. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
9. |
VEHICLE FOR HIRE BYLAW AMENDMENTS (Report: Mar. 8/05, File No.: 12-8060-20-7924/7925) (REDMS No. 1368399, 1436886, 1436458) | |
R05/8-9 |
|
It was moved and seconded | |
|
|
That the following bylaws each be introduced and given first, second and third readings: | |
|
|
(1) |
Vehicle for Hire Bylaw No. 6900, Amendment Bylaw No. 7924, which corrects inconsistencies in the bylaw with respect to sign requirements; and |
|
|
(2) |
Municipal Ticket Information Authorization Bylaw No. 7321, Amendment Bylaw No. 7925, (as amended by Committee). |
|
|
(Councillor Howard returned to the meeting - 8:34 p.m.) | |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
10. |
(Report: Apr. 4/05, File No.: 10-6125-04-14-01) (REDMS No. 1459362) | |||
R05/8-10 |
|
It was moved and seconded | |||
|
|
(1) |
That Richmond Health Services be retained to undertake a Proactive Larviciding Program, (as per their proposal dated March 24, 2005, “2005 West Nile Virus Program Proposal”). | ||
|
|
(2) |
That the Provincial Crown Land Assessment option outlined in the Richmond Health Services proposal be authorized at an additional cost of $20,000, with funding provided from the provincial grant. | ||
|
|
(3) |
That for the mosquito control program for catch basins: | ||
|
|
|
(a) |
The purchase of the larvicide briquets be authorized as a pre-cursor to potential treatment, and | |
|
|
|
(b) |
Staff be authorized to implement the mosquito control treatment program for catch basins if so ordered by the Health Authority. | |
|
|
(4) |
That the Chair, GVRD Board of Directors, be advised that Richmond Council supports the establishment of a GVRD Mosquito Control Administration and Coordination function and will participate in this service. | ||
|
|
CARRIED |
| ||
|
|
GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE – |
R05/8-11 |
11. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the General Purposes Committee meeting held on Monday, April 18th, 2005, be received for information. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
12. |
5 YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN (2005-2009) BYLAW 7939 |
R05/8-12 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That 5 Year Financial Plan (2005-2009) Bylaw 7939 be introduced and given first, second and third readings. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
13. |
2005 PROPERTY TAX RATE BYLAW 7940 (Report: April 12/05, File No.: 12-8060-20-7940) (REDMS No. 1476028, 1482474) |
R05/8-13 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That 2005 Property Tax Rates Bylaw No. 7940 be introduced and given first, second, and third readings. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
14. |
LICENSEE RETAIL STORES AND LIQUOR PRIMARY ESTABLISHMENTS | ||||||
|
|
It was moved and seconded | ||||||
R05/8-14 |
|
(1) |
That staff prepare a set of policies and guidelines for consideration by Council, which would deal with ‘temporary’ changes to existing liquor licences. | |||||
|
|
(2) |
That Development Application Fees Bylaw No. 7276, Amendment Bylaw No. 7929 (as amended by Committee) which establishes the City’s notification process for Liquor-Related licences, be introduced and given first, second and third readings. | |||||
|
|
(3) |
That the following Policy on Food Primary Licence and Liquor Primary Licence – Hours of Operation (Attachment 2 to the report dated April 5th, 2005 from the Director of Development and the Manager, Customer Services), be adopted: | |||||
|
|
|
“It is Council policy that: | |||||
|
|
|
1. |
All applicants seeking approval to extend hours for a Liquor Primary Licence or a Food Primary Liquor Licence (new or amended) beyond 2:00 a.m. will not be recommended by the City. | ||||
|
|
|
2. |
All applicants seeking approval to extend hours for Liquor Primary Licence with the exclusion of Neighbourhood Pubs or a Food Primary Liquor Licence (new or amended) up to and including 2:00 a.m. shall submit an application to the Licence Inspector, and such application will be processed in accordance with the procedure specified in Bylaw 7276. | ||||
|
|
|
3. |
All Neighbourhood Pub applicants seeking approval for an extension of hours up to current permitted neighbourhood pub hours as outlined in Policy 9302 shall submit an application to the Licence Inspector and such application will be processed in accordance with the procedure specified in Bylaw 7276.” | ||||
|
|
(4) |
That staff bring forward amendments to Zoning and Development Bylaw No. 5300 to: | |||||
|
|
|
(a) |
amend Liquor Licence related definitions to ensure consistency with Provincial Liquor Control and Licensing Regulations; | ||||
|
|
|
(b) |
amend the applicable zoning districts to remove Licensee Retail Stores as an outright permitted use; | ||||
|
|
|
(c) |
amend the “Downtown Commercial District (C7)” in order to limit Licensee Retail Stores to an accessory use to a Neighbourhood Public House; and | ||||
|
|
|
(d) |
amend the “Comprehensive Development District (CD/157)” and the “Comprehensive Development District (CD/161)” in order to limit Licensee Retail Stores to an accessory use to a Neighbourhood Public House. | ||||
|
|
(5) |
That: | |||||
|
|
|
(a) |
Policy No. 9300 – Liquor Licences (adopted July 9th, 1984), be rescinded; | ||||
|
|
|
(b) |
the following Policy for Rezoning Applications Intended to Facilitate Provincially Licensed “Liquor Primary” Uses (as amended by Committee) (Attachment 5 to the report dated April 5th, 2005 from the Director of Development and the Manager, Customer Services), be adopted: | ||||
|
|
|
|
“It is Council Policy that: | ||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
Liquor Primary License Applications – Appropriately Zoned Sites | |||
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In the case of a Liquor Primary License application for a property that is appropriately zoned to permit a Liquor Primary Use, the applicant will be so informed. | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Should an application for a Liquor Primary Licence be submitted to the City on a site that permits a Liquor Primary Use, the application will be processed in accordance with the procedure specified in Section 1.9 of the Development Application Fees Bylaw. | ||
|
|
|
|
2. |
Liquor Primary Use Applications – Site Rezoning Required | |||
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In the case of a Liquor Primary application for a property that is not appropriately zoned to permit a Liquor Primary Licence Use, the applicant will be so informed along with the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch. | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Should the applicant wish to Rezone the property to permit a Liquor Primary Use, a rezoning application must be submitted to the Development Applications Department and all applicable application fees provided. | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
A rezoning application must, at the discretion of Council, be supported by a Neighbourhood Survey that is intended to collect public opinion on the proposed Liquor Primary use. The Neighbourhood Survey will be required to be conducted by an independent Market Research Company at the sole cost of the applicant. The Director of Development will confirm approval in writing the following: | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
the minimum catchment area for the required Neighbourhood Survey; | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
the name of the Market Research Company approved to conduct the Survey; | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
the method used to conduct and compile the results of the Neighbourhood Survey; and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) |
the dates during which the Neighbourhood Survey must be conducted. | |
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
The results of the Neighbourhood Survey, together with any comments the Director of Development feels are appropriate, shall be presented to Council, through the appropriate standing committee, with a staff report including a recommendation either to support or deny the rezoning application.”; and | ||
|
|
|
(c) |
the following Policy for Licensee Retail Store (LRS) Rezoning Applications (as amended by Committee) (Attachment 9 to the report dated April 5th, 2005 from the Director of Development and the Manager, Customer Services), be adopted: | ||||
|
|
|
|
“It is Council Policy that: | ||||
|
|
|
|
Rezoning applications intended to facilitate a stand-alone Licensee Retail Store (i.e. not an accessory use to a Neighbourhood Public House) will be considered under the following general guidelines and criteria: | ||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
The proliferation of stand-alone Licensee Retail Stores is generally discouraged; | |||
|
|
|
|
2. |
Licensee Retail Store Rezoning Applications intended to facilitate the replacement of an existing BC Liquor Store, operated by the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch or an existing LRS, will be considered on a case-by-case basis; | |||
|
|
|
|
3. |
Except as noted in Section 4 below, all proposals for relocation of an existing or new Licensee Retail Store within the City of Richmond must be supported by a neighbourhood survey that is intended to collect public opinion on the proposed new location of the Licensee Retail Store. The neighbourhood survey will be required to be conducted by an independent Market Research Company at the sole cost of the applicant. The Director of Development will confirm approval in writing the following: | |||
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
the minimum catchment area for the required neighbourhood survey; | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
the name of the market research company selected by the applicant to conduct the Survey; | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
the method used to conduct and compile the results of the neighbourhood survey; and | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) |
the dates during which the neighbourhood survey must be conducted. | ||
|
|
|
|
4. |
Notwithstanding Section 3 above, proposals to replace an existing BC Liquor Store or existing LRS on the same site will not be required to conduct a neighbourhood survey.” | |||
|
|
(6) |
That staff prepare a policy on the appropriate locations in which to allow Licencee Retail Stores. | |||||
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-14 was not called, as the following amendment was introduced: |
R05/8-15 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Clause (2)(c) (of the Liquor Primary Use Applications – Site Rezoning Required Policy) of Part (5)(b) of Resolution No. R05/8-14 be amended by deleting the words “at the discretion of Council.” |
|
|
DEFEATED |
|
|
OPPOSED: Mayor Brodie Cllrs. Dang Howard Kumagai McNulty |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-14 was not called, as a further amendment was introduced: |
R05/8-16 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Part (6) of Resolution No. R05/8-14 be amended by adding the following words, “and Liquor Primary Establishments where a rezoning is required.” |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-14, as amended by Resolution No. R05/8-16 was not called, as the request was made that Part (5)(2) be dealt with separately. |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-14, as amended by Resolution No. R05/8-16 was not called, as a further amendment was introduced: |
R05/8-17 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Clause (c)(3) (of the Policy for Licensee Retail Store (LRS) Rezoning Applications) of Part (5) of Resolution No. R05/8-14 be amended by deleting after the word “Richmond”, the words “must be supported by”, and by substituting the words, “may, at the discretion of Council, require.” |
|
|
DEFEATED |
|
|
OPPOSED: Mayor Brodie Cllrs. Barnes E. Halsey-Brandt S. Halsey-Brandt Steves |
|
|
The question on Parts (1), (2), (3), (4), (5)(a), (5)(b)1, (5)(b) 2(a), (b) and (d), and (5)(c) of Resolution No. R05/8-14, as amended by Resolution No. R05/8-16 was called, and it was CARRIED. |
|
|
The question on Part (5)(2)(c) of Resolution No. R05/8-14, as amended by Resolution No. R05/8-16 was called, and it was CARRIED with Cllrs. Barnes, E. Halsey-Brandt, S. Halsey-Brandt and Steves opposed. |
|
|
PLANNING COMMITTEE – |
R05/8-18 |
15. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the Planning Committee meeting held on Tuesday, April 19th, 2005, be received for information. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
16. |
APPLICATION FOR REZONING - HUGUETTE BEAUCHESNE (RZ 04-278153, SC 05-292729 Report: April 4/05, File No.: 8060-20-7936 xr 05-292729) (REDMS No. 1466859, 1468591, 1467889, 280015) | ||
R05/8-19 |
|
It was moved and seconded | ||
|
|
(1) |
That Bylaw No. 7936, for the rezoning of 11780 Seaton Road from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area E (R1/E)” to “Two-Family Housing District (R5)”, be introduced and given first reading. | |
|
|
(2) |
That the application by Huguette Beauchesne for a Strata Title Conversion for 11780 Seaton Road be approved upon fulfillment of the following conditions: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
adoption of Bylaw No. 7936, rezoning the subject property from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area B (R1/B)” to “Two-Family Housing District (R5)” and the registration of a restrictive covenant limiting the property to a maximum of two (2) dwelling units; |
|
|
|
(b) |
payment of City property taxes up to and including the year 2005; and |
|
|
|
(c) |
submission of the appropriate plans and documents for execution by the Mayor and City Clerk within 180 days of the date of adoption of Bylaw 7936. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
17. |
APPLICATION FOR REZONING (WITH AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN) - KHALID HASAN (RZ 04-269099 Report: April 6/05, File No.: 8060-20-7927/7928) (REDMS No. 1443032, 1443167, 1463827, 1443168) | ||
R05/8-20 |
|
It was moved and seconded | ||
|
|
(1) |
That Bylaw No. 7927, to re-designate 5280 Williams Road from “Single-Family" to "Multiple-Family" on the Steveston Area Land Use Map, (Schedule 2.4 of Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7100 Steveston Area Plan), be introduced and given first reading. | |
|
|
(2) |
That Bylaw No. 7927 , having been considered in conjunction with: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
the City’s Financial Plan and Capital Program; |
|
|
|
(b) |
the Greater Vancouver Regional District Solid Waste and Liquid Waste Management Plans; |
|
|
|
is hereby deemed to be consistent with said program and plans, in accordance with Section 882(3)(a) of the Local Government Act. | |
|
|
(3) |
That Bylaw No. 7927, having been considered in accordance with the City Policy on Consultation During OCP Development, is hereby deemed not to require further consultation. | |
|
|
(4) |
That Bylaw No. 7928, for the rezoning of 5280 Williams Rd from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area C (R1/C)” to “Townhouse District (R2-0.6)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-9-20, was not called, as the following referral was introduced: |
R05/8-21 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the application for rezoning for property at 5280 Williams Road (RZ 04-269099) be referred to staff to work with the developer and immediate area residents regarding the options available for the development of the subject property. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
OPPOSED: Cllr. Dang Howard |
|
18. |
APPLICATION FOR REZONING (WITH AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN) - AM-PRI CONSTRUCTION LTD. | ||
R05/8-22 |
|
It was moved and seconded | ||
|
|
(1) |
That Bylaw No. 7920, to amend Schedule 2.10C (McLennan North Sub-Area Plan of Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7100), by introducing a map amendment to permit the portion of the proposed Alder Street between Hemlock Drive and Ferndale Road to be re-designated from “Principal Road” to “Trail”, be introduced and given first reading. | |
|
|
(2) |
That Bylaw No. 7920, having been considered in conjunction with: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
the City’s Financial Plan and Capital Program; |
|
|
|
(b) |
the Greater Vancouver Regional District Solid Waste and Liquid Waste Management Plans; |
|
|
|
is hereby deemed to be consistent with said program and plans, in accordance with Section 882(3)(a) of the Local Government Act. | |
|
|
(3) |
That Bylaw No. 7920, having been considered in accordance with the City Policy on Consultation During OCP Development, is hereby deemed not to require further consultation. | |
|
|
(4) |
That Bylaw No. 7921, to create a new multiple-family residential zone, “Comprehensive Development District (CD/167)”, and to rezone 9420 Ferndale Road, from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area F (R1/F)” to “Comprehensive Development District (CD/167)”, be introduced and given first reading. | |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
19. |
APPLICATIONS FOR REZONING |
| |
|
|
(A) |
TOYU GARDEN CITY DEVELOPMENT LTD. (RZ 04-272343 Report: March 15/05, File No.: 8060-20-7922) (REDMS No. 1447123, 1451862, 1447124) |
|
|
|
(B) |
(RZ 04-287669 - Report: March 16, 2005, File No.: 8060-20-7902) (REDMS No. 1435093, 1431362) |
|
|
|
(C) |
(RZ 05-294740 Report: March 30/05, File No.: 8060-20-7931) (REDMS No. 1465459, 1465688, 714236) |
|
|
|
(D) |
(RZ 05-294809 - Report: April 4/ 2005, File No.: 8060-20-7935) (REDMS No. 1468342, 1468499, 1468502) |
|
|
|
(E) |
(RZ 05-294590 Report: March 30/05, File No.: 8060-20-7930) (REDMS No. 1465293, 714236, 1465612) |
|
R05/8-23 |
|
It was moved and seconded | ||
|
|
That the following bylaws each be introduced and given first reading: | ||
|
|
(1) |
Bylaw No. 7922, to create a new multiple-family residential zone, “Comprehensive Development District (CD/168)” and to rezone 9440 Ferndale Road, from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area F (R1/F)” to “Comprehensive Development District (CD/168)”; | |
|
|
(2) |
Bylaw No. 7902, for the rezoning of 9200 Granville Road from “Single Family Housing District, Subdivision Area F (R1/F)” to “Comprehensive Development District (CD/128)”; | |
|
|
(3) |
Bylaw No. 7931, for the rezoning of 11851 Dunavon Place from “Two-Family Housing District (R5)” to “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area A (R1/A)”; | |
|
|
(4) |
Bylaw No. 7935, for the rezoning of 9251 No. 1 Road from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area E (R1/E)” to “Single-Family Housing District (R1 - 0.6)”; and | |
|
|
(5) |
Bylaw No. 7930, for the rezoning of 4791 Dunfell Road from “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area E (R1/E)” to “Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area A (R1/A)”. | |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
20. |
RICHMOND’S REGIONAL CONTEXT STATEMENT REVIEW (Report: Apr. 6/05, File No.: 4045-01) (REDMS No. 1216291) |
|
|
Please see Page 2 of these minutes for action taken on this matter. |
|
21. |
(Report: April 1/05, File No.: 12-8060-20-7906 xr: 01-0100-20-HC0M1/2005-Vol 01) (REDMS No. 1362557, 1363022, 1344060, 1363057) | |
R05/8-24 |
|
It was moved and seconded | |
|
|
That: | |
|
|
(1) |
The Richmond Heritage Commission 2005 Work Plan (Attachment 2 to the report dated April 1st, 2005, from the Manager, Policy Planning) be approved; and |
|
|
(2) |
Richmond Heritage Commission Bylaw No. 7906 be introduced and given first, second and third readings. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
22. |
HERITAGE DESIGNATION OF 13333 PRINCESS STREET (Report: April 1/05, File No.: 12-8060-20-7701) (REDMS No. 1346903, 1473862, 1215435, 1354581) | |
R05/8-25 |
|
It was moved and seconded | |
|
|
That: | |
|
|
(1) |
Heritage Designation Bylaw No. 7701, for the heritage designation of 13333 Princess Street, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
(2) |
The City discharge its mortgage on 13333 Princess Street upon the adoption of Heritage Designation Bylaw No. 7701. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE – |
R05/8-26 |
23. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the Public Works & Transportation Committee meeting held on Wednesday, April 20th, 2005, be received for information. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
24. |
FRASER RIVER PORT AUTHORITY – WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVE (Report: Apr. 4/05, File No.: 10-6530-01/2004-Vol 01; xr 0140-20-FRHA1) (REDMS No. 1360655) |
R05/8-27 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the City support the efforts of the Fraser River Port Authority to enhance waterborne commerce on the Fraser River by requesting the GVRD to specifically include goods movement and marine transportation as components in the updated Liveable Region Strategic Plan. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
FINANCE & CORPORATE SERVICES DIVISION |
|
25. |
AMENDMENT TO FEE ESTABLISHMENT BYLAW NO. 7889 (Report: April 20/05, File No.: 12-8060-20-7889) (REDMS No. 1486274, 1401708) |
R05/8-28 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the third reading of Fee Establishment Bylaw No. 7889 be rescinded. |
|
|
CARRIED |
R05/8-29 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Fee Establishment Bylaw No. 7889 be given third reading. |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-29 was not called, as the following amendment was introduced: |
R05/8-30 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Fee Establishment Bylaw No. 7889 be amended by deleting clauses (g) and (h) and by renumbering the remaining clauses accordingly. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
The question on Resolution No. R05/8-29, as amended by Resolution No. R05/8-30, was then called, and it was CARRIED. |
|
|
ANNOUNCEMENTS |
|
|
Mayor Brodie announced that City-owned property at 7060 Ash Street had been sold to Am-Pri Developments (2004) Ltd. for an amount of $1,301,000, and that staff had been authorized to take all necessary action to complete the transaction. |
|
|
BYLAWS FOR ADOPTION |
R05/8-31 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the following bylaws be adopted: |
|
|
Zoning & Development Bylaw No. 5300, Amendment Bylaw No. 7780 |
|
|
Zoning & Development Bylaw No. 5300, Amendment Bylaw No. 7793 |
|
|
Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7100, Amendment Bylaw No. 7876 |
|
|
Zoning & Development Bylaw No. 5300, Amendment Bylaw No. 7879 |
|
|
CARRIED |
R05/8-32 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Zoning & Development Bylaw No. 5300, Amendment Bylaw No. 7793 |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
OPPOSED: Cllrs. S. Halsey-Brandt Steves |
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
R05/8-33 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (10:30 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Monday, April 25th, 2005. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Mayor (Malcolm D. Brodie) |
Acting City Clerk (David Weber) |