Planning Committee Meeting Minutes - April 3, 2002
Planning
Committee
Date: |
Wednesday, April 3rd, 2002 |
Place: |
Anderson Room |
Present: |
Councillor Bill McNulty,
Chair |
Call to Order: |
The Chair called the meeting to order at 4:03 p.m., and indicated that the agenda would be amended to add Group Homes. |
|
|
MINUTES |
|
1. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on Tuesday, March 19th, 2002, be adopted as circulated. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE |
|
2. |
The next meeting of the Planning Committee will be held on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 4:00 p.m. in the Anderson Room. |
|
|
FINANCE AND CORPORATE SERVICES |
|
3. |
STATUTORY
NOTIFICATION PROCESS ON LAND USE APPLICATIONS |
|
|
The Manager, Legislative
Services, David Weber, reviewed the report with the Committee.
|
|
|
The
question of whether Council could be given prior knowledge about
development applications which might be of a controversial
nature was raised, and discussion ensued among Committee members
and Mr. Weber on this issue.
In response, advice was given that in general, telephone
calls and correspondence received from area residents as a
result of development application signs being erected would
provide an indication of any impending controversy.
Mr. Weber stated that based on these indicators, staff
could warn Council of any possible controversial development
applications. |
|
|
A
question was also raised about when Council would be required to
make a decision on expanding a notification area.
Discussion ensued on this issue, during which advice was
given that such a decision could be made at any time, as notices
were not mailed out until after a bylaw received first reading.
He further advised that Council and staff had the
discretion and ability to expand specific notification areas. |
|
|
(Cllr.
Sue Halsey-Brandt entered the meeting at 4:07 p.m.) |
|
|
Reference
was made to the Public Hearing notification process and a
question was raised about the feasibility of notifying area
residents prior to applications being considered by the Planning
Committee. Discussion
ensued on this matter, during which it was noted that agendas
for all Council, public hearings, and standing committee
meetings were now posted on the City web site.
The suggestion was made that a notice should be placed in
the City Notice Board on a regular basis which indicated that
agendas were available on the web site.
Advice was also given that developers, on occasion, were
requested to hold public information meetings with area
residents prior to the submission of their application to the
Planning Committee. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the 50 metre notification radius for Public Hearings and Development Permit Panel meetings be re-affirmed. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DIVISION |
|
4. |
APPLICATION
BY DMH EQUITIES LTD. FOR REZONING AT 4591 GARDEN CITY ROAD
FROM SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING DISTRICT, SUBDIVISION AREA E (R1/E)
TO COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (CD/117) |
|
|
|
The Development Coordinator,
Holger Burke, accompanied by Senior Planner/Urban Design,
Suzanne Carter-Huffman, briefly reviewed the report with the
Committee. |
|
|
|
In
response to questions, the following information was provided: |
|
|
|
|
the cost of constructing a break in
the Garden City Road median should be relatively minimal as the
work would only require the removal of the grass and
reconstruction of the curb, and should represent no problems in
placing the project in the 2003 budget |
|
|
|
the construction of Leslie Road
eastward had been identified in the City's transportation plan
and would be included as part of the Development Cost Charges
program; the construction of the break in the Garden City Road
median would be included as part of the 5 Year Capital Works
program |
|
|
|
the proposal for the extension of
Leslie Road had been agreed to by the applicant as it offered a
more viable alternative to the previous road dedication
requirement |
|
|
|
the proposed 3.5 per 100 m2
requirement for the provision of parking should be adequate
because the proposed zoning for the subject property would not
permit a restaurant use on the site. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That Bylaw No. 7191, for the rezoning of 4591 Garden City Road from Single-Family Housing District, Subdivision Area E (R1/E) to Comprehensive Development District (CD/117), be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
5. |
CHILD
CARE DEVELOPMENT BOARD 2001 ANNUAL REPORT AND 2002 WORK PROGRAM |
|
|
|
The Manager, Policy Planning,
Terry Crowe, accompanied by Social Planner Lesley Sherlock,
introduced Nicky Byres, Chair of the Child Care Development
Board. Ms. Byres
then introduced the members of the Board, some of whom were in
attendance at the meeting.
She then spoke briefly about the accomplishments of the
Board during the past year, and the problems being faced in the
future. |
|
|
|
Discussion
then took place among Committee members, staff and Ms. Byres on
the provision of child care in the City, during which the
following information was provided: |
|
|
|
|
the upcoming Child Care Needs
Assessment report would provide a list of areas where child care
facilities were required |
|
|
|
the recent cutbacks in child care
subsidies to parents had not had a major impact as most centres
were having no trouble in filling spaces, however, the only
exception might be at preschool child care facilities;
considerable time would be required before child care facilities
had open doors and empty spaces as most facilities had long
waiting lists, especially for infant/toddler care |
|
|
|
the Child Care Development Board
was working with volunteer groups to ensure that the cutbacks
did not impact child care in Richmond |
|
|
|
some of the cutbacks to child care
would be reflected in the Child Care Needs Assessment report,
however, the only area affected will be the priority in which
recommendations would be addressed. |
|
|
During
the discussion, the Board was thanked by Committee members for
their hard work and dedication, and for being very frugal in
their expenses. |
|
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the Child Care Development Board proposed 2002 Work Program and budget (attached to the report dated March 12, 2002 from the Manager, Policy Planning) be endorsed. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
6. |
CHILD
CARE DEVELOPMENT STATUTORY RESERVE FUND EXPENDITURES |
||
|
|
Mr. Crowe, briefly reviewed
the report, and advised that Kathy Stoessl, a member of the
Child Care Development Board, was available to respond to
questions from the Committee.
|
||
|
|
A
brief discussion ensued, during which in response to questions,
the following information was provided: |
||
|
|
|
9 applications for funding were
received, however, only five were being recommended for approval |
|
|
|
|
the unsuccessful applicants would
be contacted and encouraged to reapply, with suggestions being
made on how to improve their applications. |
|
|
|
Reference
was made to the amount of available funds in the Child Care
Statutory Reserve Fund, and discussion ensued between the Chair
and staff on the need to increase the funds in the reserve
accounts. The
comment was also made by Ms. Stoessl that the Child Care Needs
Assessment report would be helpful in encouraging the City to
approach developers about contributing to the reserve fund. |
||
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
||
|
|
( 1 ) |
That $28,602 be provided from the Child Care Statutory Reserve Fund in the following amounts: |
|
|
|
|
( a ) |
$20,530 to the Riverside children's Centre for playground construction; |
|
|
|
( b ) |
$4,219 to the Treehouse Early Learning Centre for an interior observation window and audio system; |
|
|
|
( c ) |
$2,000 to the East Richmond Out-of-School Care Program for an arts and crafts cupboard and I-Mac computer; |
|
|
|
( d ) |
$1,053 to the Rompers Preschool for a water table, activity tables and a storage cabinet; and |
|
|
|
( e ) |
$800 to the Burkys Preschool for a table, chairs, a carpet and toys. |
|
|
( 2 ) |
That Child Care Development Fund Expenditure Bylaw No. 7346 (Attachment 1 to the report dated March 13th, 2002, from the Manager, Policy Planning), which authorizes the transfer of $28,602 from the Child Care Development Reserve Fund, be introduced and given first, second, and third readings. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
7. |
2001
STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT REPORT |
||
|
|
Mr. Crowe, accompanied by
Planner Rob Innes, introduced Evelyn Feller, representing the
Advisory Committee on the Environment, and Marcy Sangret of AXYS
Environmental Consulting Ltd.
The State of the Environment report was then reviewed by
Ms. Feller, and both Ms. Feller and Ms. Sangret responded to
questions on: |
||
|
|
|
whether the report took into
account the decrease in automobile use which had resulted from
the implementation of the 98B Line |
|
|
|
|
the increase in the number of
automobiles registered to Richmond residents, and whether
information was available on the number of kilometres driven per
person |
|
|
|
|
the rationale for the high
consumption of water and energy in the City, and whether any
consideration had been given to alternate forms of energy to
heat water, such as solar panels |
|
|
|
|
the rationale for the increase in
the use of automobiles |
|
|
|
|
the rationale on why noise levels
in Richmond were higher than other areas. |
|
|
|
During
the discussion, Ms. Sangret and AXYS Environmental Consulting
Ltd. were congratulated on the preparation of an easily read and
user friendly report. |
|
|
|
|
Questions
were raised during the discussion about the proposed
distribution of the report to other agencies and municipalities,
and whether copies would be provided to the School District.
As a result of the discussion which ensued on this
matter, the suggestion was made that copies of the report be
forwarded to specific individuals at the City's secondary
schools for use as a teaching aid. |
|
|
|
|
In
closing discussion on the matter, the Chair expressed his
appreciation to Ms. Feller and the Committee for their hard work
and dedication, and noted that the report provided the City with
a benchmark on the direction being taken. |
|
|
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
||
|
|
That: |
||
|
|
( 1 ) |
the 2001 Richmond State of the Environment Report (attached to the report, dated February 20, 2002, from the Manager, Policy Planning) be endorsed; and |
|
|
|
( 2 ) |
staff continue to work on the Implementation Program, (as outlined in the report dated February 20, 2002 from the Manager, Policy Planning). |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
J |
8. |
GROUP HOMES |
|
|
Councillor Greenhill referred
to the discussion at the April 2nd, 2002 General
Purposes Committee meeting on group homes and the changes which
had been initiated by the Provincial Government regarding
licencing requirements. She
questioned whether a letter should be written to the Minister
responsible for group homes, requesting that the licencing
requirements for all group home facilities.
As a result of the discussion which ensued, the following
motion was introduced: |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That a letter be written on behalf of Council, to the Honourable Sindi Hawkins, Minister of Health Planning, requesting that licencing requirements for people in care be re-instated. |
|
|
Prior to the question on the
motion being called, a brief discussion ensued, during which Mr.
Crowe provided information on a possible option which might be
available in the future following the implementation of the
Community Charter, with respect to discretionary powers relating
to zoning issues. |
|
|
The
question on the motion was then called, and it was CARRIED. |
|
9. |
MANAGERS REPORT |
|
|
(1) |
Mr.
Burke advised that during the first quarter of 2002, 85
applications had been received for rezoning, subdivision,
Development Permits or Development Variance Permits, which was
more than double for the previous two years.
He stated that in March alone, 44 applications were
received, and commented that development activity in the City
appeared to be increasing. |
|
|
|
A
brief discussion ensued, during which information was requested
on the dollar value of the applications, and the anticipated
revenue which would be generated by these developments. |
|
|
(2) |
Reference was made to the Christmas
tree farm located at the south‑west corner of Steveston
Highway and Gilbert Road, and questions were raised about the
activity currently taking place on that land.
As a result, staff were requested to submit a memorandum
to the Planning Committee on this matter. |
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (5:12 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Wednesday, April 3rd, 2002. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Councillor Bill McNulty |
Fran J. Ashton |