May 10, 2010 - Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
Monday, May 10, 2010
Time: |
7:00 p.m. |
Place: |
Council Chambers Richmond City Hall |
Present: |
Mayor Malcolm D. Brodie Councillor Linda Barnes Councillor Derek Dang Councillor Evelina Halsey-Brandt Councillor Greg Halsey-Brandt Councillor Sue Halsey-Brandt Councillor Ken Johnston Councillor Bill McNulty Councillor Harold Steves Director, City Clerk’s Office – David Weber |
Call to Order: |
Mayor Brodie called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. |
RES NO. |
ITEM |
|
|
|
MINUTES |
R10/8-1 |
1. |
It was moved and seconded | ||
|
|
That: | ||
|
|
(1) |
the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held on Monday, April 26, 2010, |
|
|
|
(2) |
the minutes of the Special Council Meeting held on Monday, May 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
each be adopted as circulated, and that | ||
|
|
the Metro Vancouver “Board in Brief” dated April 23, 2010, be received for information. | ||
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
PRESENTATION |
|
|
Lani Schultz, Director, Richmond Olympic Business Office and Mike Redpath, Senior Program Manager, CPMG, showed a video: A celebration of Richmond’s Olympic Journey (on file, City Clerk’s Office). |
|
|
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE |
R10/8-2 |
2. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Council resolve into Committee of the Whole to hear delegations on agenda items (7:14 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
3. |
Delegations from the floor on Agenda items – None. |
R10/8-3 |
4. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Committee rise and report (7:15 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
CONSENT AGENDA |
R10/8-4 |
5. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That Items 6 through 13 be adopted by general consent. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
6. |
COMMITTEE MINUTES | |
|
|
That the minutes of: | |
|
|
(1) |
the Finance Committee meeting held on Monday, May 3, 2010; |
|
|
(2) |
the General Purposes Committee meeting held on Monday, May 3, 2010; |
|
|
(3) |
the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Committee meeting held on Tuesday, April 27, 2010; |
|
|
(4) |
the Planning Committee meeting held on Tuesday, May 4, 2010; |
|
|
be received for information. | |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
7. |
(File Ref. No.: 03-0900-01) (REDMS No. 2648805) | |
|
|
(1) |
That the 5 year renewal of the City’s banking services agreement with Scotiabank be approved; and |
|
|
(2) |
That the Chief Administrative Officer and the General Manager, Business & Financial Services be authorized to execute the banking services agreement between the City and Scotiabank. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
8. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8275-30-042) (REDMS No. 2879905) | ||
|
|
That the application by OJ’s Richmond Restaurant Inc., doing business as Original Joe’s Restaurant & Bar, for an amendment to increase the hours of liquor service under Food Primary Liquor License No. 303766 from Monday to Sunday 9:00 a.m. to Midnight to Sunday to Thursday 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and Friday and Saturday 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., be supported and that a letter be sent to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch advising that: | ||
|
|
(1) |
Council supports the amendment for an increase in liquor service, as the increase will not have a significant impact on the community. | |
|
|
(2) |
Council’s comments on the prescribed criteria (set out in section 53 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulations) are as follows: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
The potential for additional noise and traffic in the area if the application is approved was considered. |
|
|
|
(b) |
The impact on the community if the application is approved was assessed through a community consultation process and considered. |
|
|
|
(c) |
The amendment to permit extended hours of liquor service under the Food Primary Liquor License should not change the establishment so that it is operated in a manner that is contrary to its primary purpose as there has been no history of non-compliance with this operation. |
|
|
(3) |
As the operation of a licensed establishment may affect nearby residents the City gathered the views of the residents as follows: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
Property owners and businesses within a 100 metre radius of the subject property were contacted by letter detailing the application and provided instructions on how community comments or concerns could be submitted. |
|
|
|
(b) |
Signage was posted at the subject property and three public notices were published in a local newspaper. This signage and notice provided information on the application and instructions on how community comments or concerns could be submitted. |
|
|
(4) |
Council’s comments and recommendations respecting the views of the residents are as follows: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
That based on the number of letters sent and the lack of response received from all public notifications, Council considers that the amendment is acceptable to the majority of the residents in the area and the community. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
9. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8275-30-043) (REDMS No. 2880955) | ||
|
|
That the application by Army Navy & Air Force Veterans in Canada, Steveston Unit No. 284, to relocate Liquor Primary Club Licence No. 029737 from 11900 No. 1 Road to 3960 Chatham Street Unit 200, in order to offer liquor service be supported and that a letter be sent to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch advising that: | ||
|
|
(1) |
Council supports the application as the issuance will not pose a significant impact on the community. | |
|
|
(2) |
Council comments on the prescribed considerations are as follows: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
The impact on residential districts in the area that may be impacted by the proposed location were reviewed and considered that there would be little or no impact to those residential districts or to the surrounding areas. |
|
|
|
(b) |
The proximity of the proposed liquor primary location to other social or recreational facilities and public buildings within a 500 metre radius was reviewed and it was considered that the application would not impact these facilities. |
|
|
|
(c) |
The application for a 140 person capacity operation with liquor service hours of Sunday from 11:00 a.m. to Midnight and Monday to Saturday 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., will not pose a significant negative impact on the community based on the lack of responses received from the residents and businesses in the area. |
|
|
|
(d) |
The number and market focus of clientele to liquor primary licence establishments within a reasonable distance of the proposed location was reviewed and it was considered that there would no impact on the existing liquor primary licence establishment. |
|
|
|
(e) |
The potential for additional noise and traffic in the area if the application is approved was considered and determined that there will be little or no impact of additional noise or traffic in the area. The zoning of the proposed location, Steveston Commercial (C2), was reviewed and the use conforms to the regulations. The issue of parking was reviewed and it was considered to be sufficient to support the application. |
|
|
|
(f) |
The 2009 population figure of 193,555 for the City of Richmond and the population figure from 2006 of 24,105 for the planning area of Steveston was considered. |
|
|
|
(g) |
Relevant socio-economic information was reviewed and considered that continuation of the applicants operation is a required service in the community. |
|
|
|
(h) |
The impact on the community if the application is approved was considered and based on a lack of response from the community from public notices, the licence approval would have little impact on the community. |
|
|
(3) |
As the operation of the establishment as a licensed establishment might affect nearby residents, the City gathered the views of the residents as follows: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
Property owners and businesses within a 100 metre radius of the subject property were contacted by letter detailing the application and provided with instructions on how community comments or concerns could be submitted. |
|
|
|
(b) |
Signage was posted at the subject property and three public notices were published in a local newspaper. The signage and notice provided information on the application and instructions on how community comments or concerns could be submitted. |
|
|
(4) |
Council’s comments and recommendations respecting the views of the residents are as follows: | |
|
|
|
(a) |
One letter from the business community against the proposal was received March 25, 2010 and no responses were received from residents in the nearby area from all public notifications. Based on the lack of negative responses from residents in the nearby area, Council considers that the application is acceptable to the majority of the residents in the nearby area. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
10. |
RICHMOND OLYMPIC BUSINESS FINAL REVIEW (File Ref. No.: 11-7400-30-01, Xr.: 01-0340-30-0BUS1) (REDMS No. 2872793) |
|
|
That the staff report, dated April 30, 2010, from the Director, Richmond Olympic Business Office, entitled “Richmond Olympic Business Final Review”, be received for information. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
11. |
2011 Richmond Tall Ships Maritime Festival Operational Plan (File Ref. No.: 11-7400-20-TALL1/2010-Vol 01) (REDMS No. 2850364 v8) | |
|
|
That: | |
|
|
(1) |
Richmond be approved as a host port city for the 2011 Richmond Tall Ships Maritime Festival; |
|
|
(2) |
the final Agreement, and any related agreements or documentation to give effect to the Agreement, with the American Sail Training Association for the hosting of the 2011 Tall Ships be brought back to Council prior to execution; |
|
|
(3) |
the 2011 Richmond Tall Ships Maritime Festival Draft Operational Plan, as described in Attachment 1 of the report Tall Ships 2011 Operational Plan from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the General Manager, Community Services be endorsed; |
|
|
(4) |
$500,000 from the 2009 Operational Surplus be considered for the implementation of the Richmond Tall Ships 2011 Operational Plan; |
|
|
(5) |
in light of concerns regarding charges to volunteers and gate entry fees, the budget be referred back to staff for further discussion and a report through Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Committee; and |
|
|
(6) |
a timetable be prepared for Council through the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Committee with timelines for commitments by sponsors, vessels, other government contributions, docking availability (7th & 3rd Avenues), and infrastructure construction costs (Garry Point & Imperial Landing). |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
12. |
(File Ref. No.: 11-7400-20-TALL1) (REDMS No. 2851224 v3) |
|
|
That $550,000 from the Waterfront Reserve Fund in the 2010 Capital Budget be approved for expenditure to support the 2011 Tall Ships Maritime Festival. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
13. |
(File Ref. No.: 12-8060-20-8603, RZ 09-499857) (REDMS No. 2876911, 2877677) |
|
|
That Bylaw No. 8603, for the rezoning of 11591 Williams Road from “Single Detached (RS1/E)” to “Compact Single Detached (RC2)”, be introduced and given first reading. |
|
|
ADOPTED ON CONSENT |
|
|
BYLAWS FOR ADOPTION |
R10/8-5 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the following bylaws be adopted: |
|
|
Newspaper Distribution Regulation Bylaw No. 7954 |
|
|
Annual Property Tax Rates Bylaw No. 8591 |
|
|
Notice of Bylaw Violation Dispute Adjudication Bylaw No. 8122, Amendment Bylaw No. 8596 |
|
|
Zoning & Development Bylaw No. 5300, Amendment Bylaw No. 8530 (8811 Heather Street, RZ 07-380065) |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
R10/8-6 |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (8:13 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Monday, May 10, 2010. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Mayor (Malcolm D. Brodie) |
Corporate Officer (David Weber) |