Community Safety Committee Meeting Minutes - August 28, 2002
Community
Safety Committee
Date: |
Wednesday, August 28th, 2002 |
Place: |
Anderson Room |
Present: |
Councillor Linda Barnes,
Chair |
Absent: |
Councillor Evelina Halsey-Brandt |
Also Present: |
Councillor Lyn Greenhill |
Call to Order: |
The Chair called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. |
|
|
MINUTES |
|
1. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the meeting of the Community Safety Committee held on Tuesday, July 9th, 2002, be adopted as circulated. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE |
|
2. |
The next meeting of the
Committee will be held on Tuesday, September 10, 2002 at 4:00 p.m. in the Anderson Room. |
|
|
The Chair
added to the agenda as an additional item, Emergency
Resolution to the UBCM regarding the Canadian Coast Guard
Hovercraft. |
|
|
COMMUNITY SAFETY DIVISION |
|
3. |
Community
Safety Buildings Master Plan Schedule Change |
|
|
Fire Chief Jim Hancock
reviewed the report with the Committee. |
|
|
Discussion
then ensued among Committee members and staff, during which
advice was given that public information meetings had been held
with regard to the location of the proposed Community Safety
Headquarters and the Bridgeport and Hamilton Fire Halls.
A photograph was circulated during the discussion to
further explain the proposed location of the Sea Island Fire
Hall on City-owned property located south-east of Lancaster
Crescent. (A copy
of this photograph is on file in the City Clerks Office.)
Information was also provided that Council had endorsed
the replacement of the existing Sea Island Fire Hall but action
had been delayed because of negotiations with YVR on the
possible construction of a perimeter fire hall.
|
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the revised Community Safety Buildings Master Plan Schedule be approved (as outlined in the report dated August 12, 2002 from the Fire Chief). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
4. |
Request
for Support for Canada to Ratify the Kyoto Protocol |
||
|
|
The Assistant Manager
Environmental Programs, Margo Daykin, reviewed the report with
the Committee. |
||
|
|
Discussion
then ensued among Committee members and staff on the matter,
during which the suggestion was made that the concerns of the
City's Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE) should be
included in the report. Concerns were expressed about (i) the feasibility of
adopting the proposed recommendations when information was not
available on the impact which the Kyoto Protocol could have on
the Canadian economy, (ii) endorsing Canadas ratification of
the Kyoto Protocol when Canada had not yet made a decision on
whether to ratify that document; and (iii) whether the document
would be implemented in a fair and equitable manner.
|
||
|
|
Discussion
also took place on the principle of the Kyoto Protocol to
address climate changes and whether any recommendation adopted
by the Committee and Council should reflect that Richmond
supported the principle of lowering greenhouse gas emissions as
soon as possible. |
||
|
|
As
a result of the discussion, the following amended recommendation was introduced: |
||
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
||
|
|
That: |
||
|
|
( 1 ) |
the City of Richmond encourage Canadas ratification of the Kyoto Protocol agreement; |
|
|
|
( 2 ) |
a letter be written to communicate this resolution to the Federal Member of Parliaments; Federal Ministry of Environment, Provincial Ministers of Water, Land and Air Protection, Sustainable Resource Management and Energy and Mines; federal and Provincial opposition leaders; and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM); and |
|
|
|
( 3 ) |
the letter referred to in Part (2) above, include (i) the concerns expressed by the Advisory Committee on the Environment; and (ii) the following considerations and assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
Considerations
- |
|
|
|
|
( a ) |
climate change could result in significant environmental, economic and social impacts to the City of Richmond and its residents; |
|
|
|
( b ) |
climate change is a global issue and requires effort around the globe - the Kyoto Protocol represents an unified approach at the international level for proceeding with collective action; |
|
|
|
( c ) |
the Kyoto Protocol has established conservative targets when compared to reduction measures called for by the scientific community; this suggests that the Protocol represents a reasonable first-time effort, one that balances immediate economic concerns with long-term economic and environmental objectives; |
|
|
|
( d ) |
the Federal Government has prepared a set of strategic options that they believe will enable Canada to meet its targets despite the lack of involvement by the United States; and |
|
|
|
( e ) |
support for the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol is an extension of the City of Richmond's already existing commitments towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions and addressing climate change. |
|
|
|
Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
( a ) |
that Richmond and its stakeholders will be consulted and have a range of acceptable choices; |
|
|
|
( b ) |
that the Kyoto Protocol would be implemented in a fair and equitable manner; |
|
|
|
( c ) |
that the City of Richmond will be able to apply our principles of sustainability, equitability, cost-effectiveness, affordability, flexibility, integration, efficiency and co-operation; and |
|
|
|
( d ) |
that senior governments will provide the necessary support (e.g., financial, technological, information, professional and technical expertise, etc.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
5. |
Hamilton
Fire Hall Configuration |
|
|
Fire Chief Hancock reviewed
the report with the Committee. |
|
|
During
the discussion which ensued, information was provided that (i)
the inclusion of public washrooms (if approved) would increase
not only the scope of this project, but also the cost of the
overall project; and (ii) the public washroom component
would be addressed as part of the budget review process. |
|
|
In
response to further questions, information was provided that the
proposed washrooms would be incorporated into the building
envelope; and that the basic design of all the fire halls
incorporated the same meeting room space.
It was noted however, that the Hamilton Fire Hall would
be the only fire hall to provide outside access to washrooms,
with the internal washroom being accessible to the wheelchair
disabled. |
|
|
There
was general support shown for the proposal, however, questions
were raised about possible funding sources and the feasibility
of making the outside washrooms accessible to the wheelchair
disabled. As a
result of the discussion, staff were asked to report to the
Committee on the cost of constructing washrooms which would be
accessible to the wheelchair disabled. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the scope of the new Hamilton Fire Hall project, be changed to include public washrooms, at a cost of $55,000. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
6. |
MAINTENANCE
TRAINING UPDATE FIRE-RESCUE |
|
|
Chief Training Officer Dave
Anderson circulated to the Committee, material which he used to
explain (i) the current training schedule for the Fire-Rescue
Department and (ii) how each companys training was monitored.
A copy of this material is on file in the City Clerks
Office. |
|
|
During
the brief discussion which ensued, information was provided on
the frequency and timing of the training programs as compared to
other cities and municipalities. |
|
|
In
concluding the discussion, the Chair commented on the
difficulties encountered in organizing the training for the
department, and she thanked Mr. Anderson for his review. |
|
|
The
General Manager, Community Safety, Chuck Gale, confirmed that
the recommendations contained in following service level review
reports did not commit the Committee or Council to the
additional levels of service proposed.
He stated that the recommendations, if adopted, would be
considered as part of the overall budget process. |
|
|
Mr.
Gale noted that the Finance Select Committee had asked that the
various service levels for all City departments be consolidated
into one report, and he advised that this report was currently
being prepared. He
stated that this report would provide Council with the
bigger picture of the service provided by all departments. |
|
|
A
brief discussion ensued during which concern was expressed about
the wording of the proposed recommendations, and suggestions
were offered on possible alternatives. |
|
7. |
SERVICE
LEVEL REVIEW Fire rescue |
|
|
Fire Chief Hancock reviewed
the report and proposed recommendations with the Committee. |
|
|
Discussion
then ensued among Committee members and staff on the proposed
additional level request to implement a school-based, public
education program, and whether (i) the proposal had been
discussed with the School District; (ii) it was the
responsibility of the City to instigate the program; and (iii)
existing resources could be used to support this program. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That
the report dated August 28th, 2002, from the Fire
Chief), regarding Service Level Review Fire Rescue, be
received for information. |
|
|
Prior to the question on the motion being called, the comment was made that further information was needed on what would be involved in implementing the proposed school-based, public education program, including whether the City and the Fire Rescue Department was capable of having fire fighters attend schools to assist with the teaching of the program. |
|
|
The
question on the motion was then called, and it was CARRIED |
|
8. |
Service
Level Review - Community Bylaws Program |
|
|
|
The Manager, Community Bylaws,
Sandra Tokarczyk, advised that she was available to answer any
questions about her report.
|
|
|
|
Discussion
then ensued among Committee members and staff on such issues as:
|
|
|
|
|
the
service delivery contract between the City and Environmental
Health advice was given that a report was currently being
prepared which would provide a number of options on the
feasibility of contracting out the services currently provided
through the Environmental Health Department |
|
|
|
barking
dogs staff were currently exploring ways to deal with
barking dogs, and both this issue and the delivery of services
by Environmental Health were a top priority |
|
|
|
the
City's graffiti program; the steps being taken to deal with
this problem and the involvement of outside agencies including
BC Hydro in a possible partnership program. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the report (dated August 19th, 2002, from the Manager, Community Bylaws), regarding the Community Bylaws Program Service Level Review, be received for information. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
9. |
Service
Level Review - Emergency Services Program |
|
|
|
The Manager, Emergency &
Environmental Programs, Suzanne Bycraft, briefly reviewed her
report with the Committee. |
|
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That: |
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
the report (dated August 13, 2002 from the Manager, Emergency & Environmental Programs), regarding Emergency Services Administration service levels, be received for information; and |
|
|
( 2 ) |
letters be sent to the Minister of Public Safety and the Solicitor General and the Office of the Premier urging the provincial government to restore the Provincial Emergency Programs funding for Emergency Management Training and the Personal Disaster Assistance program. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
10. |
Service
Level Review - Environmental Programs |
|
|
|
Ms. Bycraft reviewed her
report with the Committee.
|
|
|
|
Discussion
then ensued among Committee members and staff on |
|
|
|
(i) |
the types of
materials accepted at the Recycling Depot; |
|
|
(ii) |
whether
residents were encouraged to compost their yard waste; |
|
|
(iii) |
whether
commercial operations were charged for depositing yard waste
regardless of where these companies were based; and whether
non-Richmond residents could be charged more; |
|
|
(iv) |
whether any consideration had been
given to establishing a limit to the number of bags which could
be put out for the curb side collection of garden waste; |
|
|
(iii) |
the impact which the proposed
increase in rates to dispose of yard waste items might have, and
whether residents should be charged; and |
|
|
(iii) |
whether commercial operators should
be prohibited from using the Recycling Depot. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That: |
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
the report (dated August 14, 2002 from the Manager, Emergency & Environmental Programs), regarding Environmental Programs services levels, be received for information; and |
|
|
( 2 ) |
the fee for disposal of yard waste items at the Recycling Depot be increased from $12 per cubic yard to $15 per cubic yard effective January 1, 2003. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That staff consider establishing a different rate for non-Richmond businesses and residents utilizing the Recycling Depot. |
|
|
WITHDRAWN |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the issue of allowing commercial operators to dispose of yard waste at the Recycling Depot be referred to staff for an analysis of pricing and other strategies. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
11. |
EMERGENCY
RESOLUTION TO UBCM FOR SUPPORT FOR A SECOND HOVERCRAFT |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That staff report to the September 9th, 2002 Council Meeting with a resolution to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, in support of a second hovercraft being commissioned to the West Coast of British Columbia, and that the resolution include the submission of a letter through the Mayors Office. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
12. |
MANAGERS REPORT |
|
|
Mr. Gale provided information on the efforts of the Richmond-based Vancouver Metropolitan Lions Club to raise funds which were then channelled back to the City, and on an event to be held on November 2nd, 2002. |
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (6:00 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the meeting of the Community Safety Committee of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Wednesday, August 28th, 2002. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Councillor Linda Barnes |
Fran J. Ashton |