Community Safety Committee Meeting Minutes - June 11, 2002
Community
Safety Committee
Date: |
Tuesday, June 11th, 2002 |
Place: |
Anderson Room |
Present: |
Councillor Linda Barnes,
Chair |
Call to Order: |
The Chair called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. |
|
|
MINUTES |
|
1. |
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the minutes of the meeting of the Community Safety Committee held on Thursday, June 6th, 2002, be adopted as circulated. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
(Councillor Steves entered the
meeting at 4:03 p.m.) |
|
|
NEXT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE |
|
2. |
The next regular meeting of the Committee is
scheduled for Tuesday, July 9th, 2002 at 4:00 p.m. in the Anderson Room.
The Chair
noted that there would be a special meeting of the Committee on
Wednesday, June 12th, 2002 to review the service
levels of Community Bylaws and Emergency Programs. |
|
|
COMMUNITY SAFETY DIVISION |
|
3. |
CREATION
OF AN INTEGRATED HOMICIDE TEAM REPORT TO RCMP MAYORS
CONSULTATIVE FORUM |
|
|
|
The General Manager, Community
Safety, Chuck Gale, reported that Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge
had each approved the creation of the proposed team, that North
Vancouver District and City, the Township of Langley and the
City of Surrey were still considering the proposal, and that
Burnaby, White Rock, and the City of Langley had rejected the
concept. |
|
|
|
In
response to questions about why a number of municipalities had
said no to the proposal, Mr. Gale advised that the funding
formula which had been developed in conjunction with the new
program would mean that certain communities, which until now had
not had a homicide assignment but still received assistance at
no cost from RCMP in other jurisdictions when a homicide
occurred, would now have to pay for the provision of this
service. He stated that in all likelihood the RCMP Mayors
Consultative Forum would be addressing that issue further. |
|
|
|
Mr.
Gale further advised that the Solicitor General had indicated
that this initiative would not be permitted to fail, and that
either cities and municipalities would voluntarily accept the
proposal, or the Solicitor Generals Department would make
participation mandatory, which was also causing concern for
those municipalities which had not had to pay in the past.
He stated that the Lower Mainland Policing Advisory
Committee would prefer that participation be undertaken in a way
which would work for every municipality and city within the
Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD).
Mr. Gale further advised that some municipalities
were of the view that the homicide team should be funded totally
by the Provincial Government. |
|
|
|
(Councillor
Howard entered the meeting 4:10 p.m.) |
|
|
|
In
answer to further questions about acceptance of the program, Mr.
Gale advised that if the Consultative Forum voted to approve the
project, each municipality within the Lower Mainland would
receive a bill for their share of the costs, and each
municipality would be obliged to pay, regardless of their
individual views. He
then briefly reviewed the stages of implementation of the
integrated homicide team, explaining that stage one would be an
investigation of the detachments policed by the RCMP in the
GVRD; in stage two, the geographic area would be extended to
include the RCMP jurisdictions within the Lower Mainland; and
stage three would result in the inclusion of non‑RCMP
policed municipalities. |
|
|
|
Discussion
then ensued among Committee members and staff, during which in
response to questions, the following information was provided: |
|
|
|
|
multiple
teams comprised of a total of 39 investigators would be
available to respond to multiple crimes, all of which would
handled on a priority basis, with crimes involving death being
given top priority |
|
|
|
once
a decision had been reached, the team would be formed with RCMP
officers who had successfully applied from throughout BC |
|
|
|
the
cost of $668,000 to the City would not impact the City's
budget as the current City resources would be reduced to
accommodate this payment; the City would contribute either
officers or money to the total value of $668,000 |
|
|
|
the
current homicide caseload in Richmond would be transferred to
the proposed new team. |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
That the report (dated May 24th, 2002, from the General Manager, Community Safety) to the RCMP Mayors Consultative Forum regarding the creation of an Integrated Homicide Team be endorsed, and |
|
|
( 2 ) |
That the RCMP Detachments contribution to the Integrated Homicide Team of $688,000, (annualized basis), be approved on the basis that the funds be found within the current approved funding envelope for the detachment. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
4. |
FIRE
SERVICES ACT INSURANCE PREMIUM TAX |
|
|
|
Fire Chief Jim Hancock
indicated that he was available to respond to any questions
which the Committee might have.
A brief discussion then ensued on this matter, during
which the following information was provided: |
|
|
|
|
a
concentrated effort was being made by six or seven
municipalities, including Richmond, to have the Provincial
Government redirect the insurance premium tax back to the
collecting municipality |
|
|
|
this
matter had been an issue with municipalities for a period of
time, however, the City of Surrey had made the initial steps to
address the matter; another possibility was that as part of the
new Community Charter, there was a move to transfer some
responsibility to the local Fire Chiefs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
( 1 ) |
That the BC Government be requested to redirect the 4% Insurance Premium Tax, less the costs directly incurred by the office of the Fire Commissioner, to the City of Richmond, to offset the costs of providing fire services; and |
|
|
( 2 ) |
That a copy of the report (dated May 17th, 2002, from the General Manager, Community Safety) be forwarded to the Lower Mainland Municipal Association and the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, the Association of BC Fire Chiefs, GVRD Fire Chiefs, and the International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1286, for consideration. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the Lower Mainland Municipal Association and the Union of British Columbia Municipalities be requested to lobby the Provincial Government on behalf of the City with regard to the redirection of the 4% Insurance Premium Tax. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
5. |
STATUS OF FIRE
INSPECTIONS |
|
|
|
Chief Fire Prevention Officer
Rick Stene reported that as a result of a review of the existing
system of Company Fire inspections which compared that system
with the Night Inspection program, the inspection system was
modified in April of 2001. He advised that a new form was created for use only by
firefighters, which made it easier for the firefighters to (i)
recognize what they should be checking for, and to (ii) record
the results of the inspection.
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Stene further advised that the method of assigning inspections
was modified to assign 20 inspections per month for every
engine, ladder and rescue vehicle, and to add Saturday to the
inspection calendar. He stated that as a result of these changes, approximately
1,000 more inspections were completed in 2001 than in previous
years. |
|
|
|
Mr.
Stene noted that constant changes were being made to the
computer system to (i) provide easier access to the
firefighters, and (ii) make it easier for Fire Prevention to
assign and monitor the results. He stated that the goal for 2002 was to increase the number
of inspections by at least 10% over the 2001 total. In closing, Mr. Stene advised that the effectiveness of the
changes would be monitored and evaluated and a report made to
the Committee at the end of 2002. |
|
|
|
A
brief discussion ensued, during which appreciation was expressed
for the initiative taken to improve the inspection process. |
|
|
6. |
COMMUNITY
SAFETY BUILDINGS PROJECT - UPDATE |
|
|
|
Mr. Gale reviewed the report
and recommendation with the Committee, during which he
elaborated on his concerns about the issue of the proposed
referendum, the complexity of the wording of the referendum
question, and how to educate the residents to properly respond
to the question. |
|
|
|
Discussion
ensued among Committee members and staff on this matter, during
which, in response to questions, the following information was
provided: |
|
|
|
|
sufficient
funds were available to complete the design work for the three
proposed new fire halls, however, funds were not currently
available to complete construction |
|
|
|
the
report to be presented to the Committee on July 9th,
2002 would provide details of funding options |
|
|
|
the
design process would be completed, and input obtained from the
firefighters on the proposed design, by the Fall of this year |
|
|
During
the discussion, concern was expressed that one of the financing
options proposed would be an increase in property tax rates, and
staff were urged to consider other options.
The suggestion was also made that a decision on the
question of holding a referendum should be delayed until
presentation of the financing options report to the Committee.
Discussion then ensued on whether a delay in considering
the referendum issue until the July 9th, 2002
Committee meeting would have an impact on the process, if a
decision was made to proceed with a referendum.
|
|
|
|
As
a result of the discussion, the following referral motion was introduced: |
|
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
|
That the report (dated May 24th, 2002, from the General Manager, Community Safety), regarding the Community Safety Buildings Project Update, be referred to the July 9th, 2002 meeting of the Community Safety Committee. |
|
|
|
CARRIED |
|
7. |
APPOINTMENT
AS BYLAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER |
|
|
|
|
|
That Tom Krish be appointed as a Bylaw Enforcement Officer in accordance with Section 36 of the Police Act, and that such appointment be for the term of his employment as Bylaw Enforcement Officer with the City. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
8. |
VICTIM SERVICE UNIT |
|
|
Insp. Tony Mahon, Operations
Support Officer for the Richmond Detachment of the RCMP,
introduced Mr. Scott Vallance, Coordinator, Victim/Witness
Services, and Glenna Christianson.
Insp. Mahon advised that Victim/Witness Services dealt
with 900 to 1,000 victims on an annual basis; that the police
officer attending an incident would determine whether
Victim/Witness Services was required; and that this service was
one of the most valuable people programs functioning
within the department. |
|
|
A
short video was then presented on the assistance provided by
Victim/Witness Services to the victims of such incidents as
crime and accidents. |
|
|
Discussion then ensued among Committee members and the delegation on the Victim/Witness Services program, during which Mr. Vallance provided information on the history of the program from its conception, and explained the purpose of the video which was to make people aware of operation of the program on a daily basis, and to reach out to the corporate community for donations. In response to questions, advice was given the program, currently located at the former City Hall facility, would be relocated to the new Community Safety headquarters building. Information was also provided on (i) the process followed when Victim/Witness Services was contacted and the assistance provided to victims of crime, (ii) how staff coped with the stress of the various situations in which they were placed, and (iii) the number of paid personnel and volunteers in the program. |
|
|
In
concluding the discussion, the Chair asked Mr. Vallance to
provide written material regarding the program to her.
She also stated that the program offered an invaluable
service to victims. |
|
9. |
MANAGERS REPORT |
|
|
Insp.
Mahon provided an update to Committee on Marihuana grow
operations in the City. A
copy of his report is attached as Schedule A and forms part of
these minutes. A
brief discussion then ensued among Committee members and Insp.
Mahon on this matter. |
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting adjourn (5:26 p.m.). |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the meeting of the Community Safety Committee of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Tuesday, June 11th, 2002. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Councillor Linda Barnes |
Fran J. Ashton |