Development Permit Panel Meeting Minutes - October 30, 2002
Development Permit Panel
Wednesday, October 30th,
2002
Time: |
3:30 p.m. |
Place: |
Council Chambers |
Present: |
Terry Crowe, Acting General Manager, Urban
Development, Acting Chair |
The meeting was called to order at 3:30 p.m. |
1. |
Minutes |
|
It was moved and seconded That the minutes of the meeting of the Development Permit Panel held on Wednesday, October 16, 2002, be adopted. |
2. |
Development
Permit
DP 02-212757
|
||
|
APPLICANT: |
London Landing
Development Corp. |
|
|
PROPERTY LOCATION: |
13200 Princess
Street |
|
|
INTENT OF PERMIT: |
To allow the development of 19 detached townhouse units containing a
total floor area of 2,636.874 m (28,384 ft). |
|
|
Applicants Comments |
|
Mr. Dana Westermark, 21, 4111 Garry St., with the aid of site plans, elevations, a landscape plan and an artists renderings, reviewed the location of the property and the conditions of adjacency. The London Landing design concept of the first phase, including the 2.5 storey character, will be continued into this development. The connections to the future development to the north, the pedestrian and vehicle right-of-way, and the two public pedestrian right-of-ways were identified. Information was provided that the internal road is to be governed by cross access agreements with the adjoining parcels, which will allow in and out vehicle traffic at a number of points. The future intended park area was also identified, as was the planned public space and the connection to the dyke. |
|
Staff Comments |
|
The Manager, Development Applications, Joe Erceg, said that the rezoning was approved at the October 28th, 2002 meeting of Council. In addition, Mr. Erceg said that the proposed development will contain details similar to those of the existing London Landing development, which has been well received, and that staff supported the project. |
|
Correspondence |
|
None. |
|
Gallery Comments |
|
None. |
|
Panel Discussion |
|
In response to a question from the Panel, Mr. Erceg confirmed that the public right-of-ways could not be removed or amended by the Strata Corporations involved. |
|
Panel Decision |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
That a Development Permit be issued for 13200 Princess Street on a site zoned Comprehensive Development District (CD/115), which would allow the development of 19 detached townhouse units containing a total floor area of 2,636.874 m (28,384 ft). |
|
CARRIED |
3. |
Development
Permit
DP 02-205966
|
|||
|
APPLICANT: |
Westbank
Projects Corporation |
|
|
|
PROPERTY LOCATION: |
11760
Steveston Highway |
|
|
|
INTENT OF PERMIT: |
To allow the development of a commercial/retail building on one (1) lot containing a total floor area of 1,318.716 m (14,195 ft); and
To
vary the provisions of Zoning and Development Bylaw No. 5300 to
permit the following: |
|
|
|
1. |
Reduce the side yard setback along the east property line from 6 m (19.865 ft) to 1 m (3.281 ft); |
||
|
2. |
Reduce the rear yard setback along the south property line from 6 m (19.865 ft) to 1.5 m (4.921 ft); |
||
|
3. |
Reduce the side yard setback along the west property line from 6 m (19.865 ft) to 3 m (9.843 ft); and |
||
|
4. |
Increase the lot coverage from 35% to 36%. |
||
|
Applicants Comments |
|
Mr. Scott Douglas, Kasian Kennedy Architects, on behalf of Westbank, said that at the first presentation of the project to the Panel, in August 2002, two items were asked to be reconsidered, i) the relationship of the proposed developed to the neighbouring Chevron station and ii) the building scheme. |
|
Mr. Douglas, with the aid of a context plan and a landscape plan, reviewed Westbanks response to the two issues. The proposed two-building scheme is more in keeping with the two shopping centres; the pad building is across the front of the site facing Steveston Highway; the second building is tucked back behind CRU9 into the corner of the site, which better allows for the circulation of pedestrian and vehicle traffic; 8600 and 5600 sq. ft. buildings are proposed; 52 parking stalls have been provided which relates well to office, retail and personal service uses. There will be no vehicle access to the Chevron station, however, pedestrian access is provided. |
|
A number of setbacks have been requested to achieve the desired square footage. Handicapped access has been provided from Steveston Highway through to the shopping centre. The south side of CRU11 will be utilized for loading. The street tree treatment along Steveston Highway will be continued and the existing landscaping on the subject site will be augmented. The elevations, as they front onto parking and Steveston Highway, are typical; the end caps of buildings contain minimal glazing. |
|
Staff Comments |
|
The Manager, Development Applications, Joe Erceg, said that the initial presentation of the project in August 2002 had resulted in a referral to staff for review of the concerns identified by the Panel and the owners of the neighbouring Chevron station. All concerns have now been addressed. The variances are considered minor and all were identified in the rezoning process. As such, staff were supportive of the application. |
|
Correspondence |
|
None. |
|
Gallery Comments |
|
Mr. Larry Hardisty, Area Development Manager, Chevron Canada Limited, said that Chevron was satisfied with the current proposal. |
|
Panel Discussion |
|
The General Manager, Engineering and Public Works, Jeff Day, said the current proposal was far better than the previous presentation in maintaining the open look and feel of Ironwood Shopping Centre. |
|
Panel Decision |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That a Development Permit be issued for 11760 Steveston Highway on a site zoned Community Commercial District (C3), which would allow the development of a commercial/retail building on one (1) lot containing a total floor area of 1,318.716 m (14,195 ft); and |
|
|
Vary the provisions of Zoning and Development Bylaw No. 5300 to permit the following: |
|
|
1. |
Reduce the side yard setback along the east property line from 6 m (19.865 ft) to 1 m (3.281 ft); |
|
2. |
Reduce the rear yard setback along the south property line from 6 m (19.865 ft) to 1.5 m (4.921 ft); |
|
3. |
Reduce the side yard setback along the west property line from 6 m (19.865 ft) to 3 m (9.843 ft); and |
|
4. |
Increase the lot coverage from 35% to 36%. |
|
CARRIED |
4. |
Development
Variance Permit
02-215548
|
||
|
APPLICANT: |
Canadian
Martyrs Parish |
|
|
PROPERTY LOCATION: |
5771 Granville
Avenue |
|
|
INTENT OF PERMIT: |
To vary the maximum height in the Assembly District (ASY) zone for a
proposed new cross-tower from 12 m (39.37 ft) to 13.75 m (45.11 ft)
at the new Canadian Martyrs Parish at 5771 Granville Avenue. |
|
|
Applicants Comments |
|
Mr. Greg Andrews and Mr. Tom Abale, of DGBK Architects, were present. Mr. Andrews provided the following points in his review of the project the application was a variance request for the maximum height allowed for a free standing church cross tower; the cross tower structure will be located next to the front entrance to the church; the tower was designed to reflect and respond to the character of the building itself; and, the current height envelope gave a disproportional feel to the tower and would be improved by the tower rising above the envelope. |
|
Staff Comments |
|
The Manager, Development Applications, Joe Erceg, said that the application was for a height variance of 6 ft. The variance, as noted, was required for the cross element only. In addition, Mr. Erceg said that the Assembly Zone did not provide for certain elements without a variance so that requests for a variance for these elements were common. Staff considered this variance and the element minimal, and were supportive of the request. |
|
Correspondence |
|
M. Mackay, Sharon Manor Schedule 1. |
|
Petition from residents of Sharon Manor Schedule 2. |
|
L. Danielson, 9944 Swordfern Way, Youbou, BC Schedule 3. |
|
L. Boyle, Sharon Manor Schedule 4. |
|
G. Seeley, Sharon Manor Schedule 5. |
|
E. Strauss, Sharon Manor Schedule 6. |
|
B. Miller, Sharon Manor Schedule 7. |
|
Gallery Comments |
|
A resident of 5791 Granville Avenue, expressed his concerns that the tower exceeded the City bylaw and that the front of the building did not need to have a cross. |
|
Ms. M. Thomas, 5791 Granville Avenue, said that she would be glad when the project was finished as it had caused a lot of trouble, specifically by the inopportune placement of a garbage container. Ms. Thomas wondered why the residents of her building had been asked for their opinion. In response to questions from Ms. Thomas, Mr. Abale and Mr. Andrews provided further clarification of the location and structure of the cross tower. |
|
In response to questions from the Panel, Mr. Andrews provided the information that a small paved area will be located at the base of the tower structure and that the tower will be constructed from 6 x 10 galvanized plated material. |
|
Mr. Abale apologized for the location of the garbage container referred to by Ms. Thomas. Upon the concerns of the residents of 5791 Granville Avenue becoming evident, Mr. Abale said that he had immediately ordered the structure to be demolished and relocated. Further to this, Mr. Abale said that he understood some of the neighbours concerns as the site had previously been underdeveloped and therefore contained a more significant amount of open space than what exists now. It had not ever been the intention, however, to do anything insensitive. |
|
Panel Discussion |
|
In response to a question from the Acting Chair, Mr. Erceg provided examples of where variances such as the proposed, or higher, had been granted previously. In light of those precedents, support for the project was expressed. Further, the mass of the church was noted to be well below the maximum limit; the low profile cross was unlit and would cause no discomfort to neighbours; a lower tower structure height would look disproportional; and, tower structures were noted to be common for religious facilities. |
|
Panel Decision |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
That a Development Variance Permit be issued that would vary the maximum height in the Assembly District (ASY) zone for a proposed new cross-tower from 12 m (39.37 ft) to 13.75 m (45.11 ft) at the new Canadian Martyrs Parish at 5771 Granville Avenue. |
|
CARRIED |
5. |
GENERAL
COMPLIANCE - REQUEST BY WESTBANK PROJECTS LTD. FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE RULING ON A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AT
STEVESTON HIGHWAY/NO. 5 ROAD
|
||
|
APPLICANT: |
Westbank
Projects Ltd. |
|
|
PROPERTY LOCATION: |
Steveston Highway/No. 5 Road |
|
|
Applicants Comments |
|
The applicant was not present. |
|
Staff Comments |
|
None. |
|
Correspondence |
|
None. |
|
Gallery Comments |
|
None. |
|
Panel Discussion |
|
None. |
|
Panel Decision |
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
That the attached plans for improved pedestrian access, vehicular access and site layout be considered to be in general compliance with DP96-000212. |
|
CARRIED |
6. |
Adjournment |
|
|
It was moved and seconded |
|
|
That the meeting be adjourned at 4:18 p.m. |
|
|
CARRIED |
|
|
Certified a true and correct copy of the Minutes of the meeting of the Development Permit Panel of the Council of the City of Richmond held on Wednesday, October 30th, 2002. |
_________________________________ |
_________________________________ |
Terry Crowe |
Deborah MacLennan |